OBJECTIVE: In this study, information about the localization of the central sulcus obtained by magnetic source imaging (MSI) was intraoperatively translated to the brain, using frameless image-guided stereotaxy. In the past, the MSI results could be translated to the surgical space only by indirect methods (e.g., the comparison of the MSI results, displayed in surface renderings, with bony landmarks or blood vessels on the exposed brain surface). METHODS: Somatosensory evoked fields were recorded with a MAGNES II biomagnetometer (Biomagnetic Technologies Inc., San Diego, CA). Using the single equivalent current dipole model, the localization of the somatosensory cortex was superimposed on magnetic resonance imaging with a self-developed contour fit program. The magnetic resonance image set containing the magnetoencephalographic dipole was then transferred to a frameless image-guided stereotactic system. Intraoperatively, the gyrus containing the dipole was identified as the postcentral gyrus, using neuronavigation, and the next anterior sulcus was regarded as the central sulcus. With intraoperative cortical recording of somatosensory evoked potentials, this assumption was verified in each case. RESULTS: In all cases, the preoperatively assumed localization of the central sulcus and motor cortex with MSI agreed with the intraoperative identification of the central sulcus using the phase reversal technique. CONCLUSION: The combined use of MSI and a frameless stereotactic system allows a fast orientation of eloquent brain areas during surgery. This may contribute to a safer and more radical surgery in lesions adjacent to the motor cortex.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, information about the localization of the central sulcus obtained by magnetic source imaging (MSI) was intraoperatively translated to the brain, using frameless image-guided stereotaxy. In the past, the MSI results could be translated to the surgical space only by indirect methods (e.g., the comparison of the MSI results, displayed in surface renderings, with bony landmarks or blood vessels on the exposed brain surface). METHODS: Somatosensory evoked fields were recorded with a MAGNES II biomagnetometer (Biomagnetic Technologies Inc., San Diego, CA). Using the single equivalent current dipole model, the localization of the somatosensory cortex was superimposed on magnetic resonance imaging with a self-developed contour fit program. The magnetic resonance image set containing the magnetoencephalographic dipole was then transferred to a frameless image-guided stereotactic system. Intraoperatively, the gyrus containing the dipole was identified as the postcentral gyrus, using neuronavigation, and the next anterior sulcus was regarded as the central sulcus. With intraoperative cortical recording of somatosensory evoked potentials, this assumption was verified in each case. RESULTS: In all cases, the preoperatively assumed localization of the central sulcus and motor cortex with MSI agreed with the intraoperative identification of the central sulcus using the phase reversal technique. CONCLUSION: The combined use of MSI and a frameless stereotactic system allows a fast orientation of eloquent brain areas during surgery. This may contribute to a safer and more radical surgery in lesions adjacent to the motor cortex.
Authors: J P Mäkelä; E Kirveskari; M Seppä; M Hämäläinen; N Forss; S Avikainen; O Salonen; S Salenius; T Kovala; T Randell; J Jääskeläinen; R Hari Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: T Krings; M H Reinges; S Erberich; S Kemeny; V Rohde; U Spetzger; M Korinth; K Willmes; J M Gilsbach; A Thron Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: H Duffau; L Capelle; D Denvil; N Sichez; P Gatignol; M Lopes; M-C Mitchell; J-P Sichez; R Van Effenterre Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: D Winkler; G Strauss; S Hesse; A Goldammer; M Hund-Georgiadis; A Richter; O Sabri; T Kahn; J Meixensberger Journal: Radiologe Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 0.635
Authors: Frederick J P Langheim; Alexander N Merkle; Arthur C Leuthold; Scott M Lewis; Apostolos P Georgopoulos Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2005-11-23 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: S Sarubbo; F Latini; A Panajia; C Candela; R Quatrale; P Milani; E Fainardi; E Granieri; G Trapella; V Tugnoli; M A Cavallo Journal: Neurol Sci Date: 2011-04-13 Impact factor: 3.307