OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether a treatment according to a clinical algorithm could improve the low survival rates in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DESIGN: Uncontrolled prospective trial. SETTING: One university hospital intensive care department. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 122 patients with ARDS, consecutively admitted to the ICU. INTERVENTIONS: ARDS was treated according to a criteria-defined clinical algorithm. The algorithm distinguished two main treatment groups: The AT-sine-ECMO (advanced treatment without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) groups (n = 73) received a treatment consisting of a set of advanced non-invasive treatment options, the ECMO treatment group (n = 49) received additional extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) using heparin-coated systems. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The groups differed in both APACHE II (16 +/- 5 vs 18 +/- 5 points, p = 0.01) and Murray scores (3.2 +/- 0.3 vs 3.4 +/- 0.3 points, p = 0.0001), the duration of mechanical ventilation prior to admission (10 +/- 9 vs 13 +/- 9 days, p = 0.0151), and length of ICU stay in Berlin (31 +/- 17 vs 50 +/- 36 days, p = 0.0016). Initial PaO2/FIO2 was 86 +/- 27 mm Hg in AT-sine-ECMO patients that improved to 165 +/- 107 mm Hg on ICU day 1, while ECMO patients showed an initial PaO2/FIO2 of 67 +/- 28 mm Hg and improvement to 160 +/- 102 mm Hg was not reached until ICU day 13. QS/QT was significantly higher in the ECMO-treated group and exceeded 50% during the first 14 ICU days. The overall survival rate in our 122 ARDS patients was 75%. Survival rates were 89% in the AT-sine ECMO group and 55% in the ECMO treatment group (p = 0.0000). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that patients with ARDS can be successfully treated with the clinical algorithm and high survival rates can be achieved.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether a treatment according to a clinical algorithm could improve the low survival rates in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DESIGN: Uncontrolled prospective trial. SETTING: One university hospital intensive care department. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 122 patients with ARDS, consecutively admitted to the ICU. INTERVENTIONS:ARDS was treated according to a criteria-defined clinical algorithm. The algorithm distinguished two main treatment groups: The AT-sine-ECMO (advanced treatment without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) groups (n = 73) received a treatment consisting of a set of advanced non-invasive treatment options, the ECMO treatment group (n = 49) received additional extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) using heparin-coated systems. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The groups differed in both APACHE II (16 +/- 5 vs 18 +/- 5 points, p = 0.01) and Murray scores (3.2 +/- 0.3 vs 3.4 +/- 0.3 points, p = 0.0001), the duration of mechanical ventilation prior to admission (10 +/- 9 vs 13 +/- 9 days, p = 0.0151), and length of ICU stay in Berlin (31 +/- 17 vs 50 +/- 36 days, p = 0.0016). Initial PaO2/FIO2 was 86 +/- 27 mm Hg in AT-sine-ECMO patients that improved to 165 +/- 107 mm Hg on ICU day 1, while ECMO patients showed an initial PaO2/FIO2 of 67 +/- 28 mm Hg and improvement to 160 +/- 102 mm Hg was not reached until ICU day 13. QS/QT was significantly higher in the ECMO-treated group and exceeded 50% during the first 14 ICU days. The overall survival rate in our 122 ARDSpatients was 75%. Survival rates were 89% in the AT-sine ECMO group and 55% in the ECMO treatment group (p = 0.0000). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that patients with ARDS can be successfully treated with the clinical algorithm and high survival rates can be achieved.
Authors: Mark R Hemmila; Stephen A Rowe; Tamer N Boules; Judiann Miskulin; John W McGillicuddy; Douglas J Schuerer; Jonathan W Haft; Fresca Swaniker; Saman Arbabi; Ronald B Hirschl; Robert H Bartlett Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Steffen Weber-Carstens; Sven Bercker; Matthias Hommel; Maria Deja; Martin MacGuill; Christiane Dreykluft; Udo Kaisers Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-01-31 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Thomas Müller; Alois Philipp; Andreas Luchner; Christian Karagiannidis; Thomas Bein; Michael Hilker; Leopold Rupprecht; Julia Langgartner; Markus Zimmermann; Matthias Arlt; Jan Wenger; Christof Schmid; Günter Aj Riegger; Michael Pfeifer; Matthias Lubnow Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 9.097