Literature DB >> 9310514

Combined effects of sleeping position and prenatal risk factors in sudden infant death syndrome: the Nordic Epidemiological SIDS Study.

N Oyen1, T Markestad, R Skaerven, L M Irgens, K Helweg-Larsen, B Alm, G Norvenius, G Wennergren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prone sleeping is a strong risk factor for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). We investigated whether the combined effect of prone sleeping position and prenatal risk factors further increased the SIDS risk.
METHODS: In the Nordic Epidemiological SIDS Study, parents of SIDS victims in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden completed a questionnaire on potential risk factors for SIDS. Forensic pathologists verified the SIDS diagnosis. Four controls of the same gender, age, and place of birth were selected. This matched case-control study, which included 244 SIDS cases and 869 controls from 1992 to 1995, was analyzed by conditional logistic regression.
RESULTS: Odds ratios (ORs) for prone and side sleeping compared with supine sleeping for the last sleep were 13.9 (95% confidence interval 8.2-24) and 3.5 (2.1-5.7). Infants 13 to 24 weeks old had particularly high risk in prone and side sleeping, at 28.5 (7.9-107) and 5.9 (1.6-22). OR for prone sleeping was higher in girls, at 30.4 (11-88), than in boys, 10.3 (5.5-19). We found strong combined effects of sleeping position and prenatal risk factors (more than multiplicative). The OR for prone and side sleeping was increased for infants with birth weight <2500 g, at 83 (25-276) and 36.6 (13-107); for preterm infants, at 48.8 (19-128) and 40.5 (14-115); and for intrauterine growth retarded, at 38.8 (14-108) and 9.6 (4.3-22), compared with supine position in infants without these prenatal factors. The combined effect of nonsupine positions and intrauterine growth retarded was highest among 13- to 24-week-old infants. Effects of combined presence of nonsupine sleeping positions and each of the factors of smoking in pregnancy, young maternal age, higher parity, low level of maternal education, and single motherhood were more than additive. Attributable fractions in the population for prone and side sleeping were 18.5% and 26.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: Both prone and side sleeping increased the risk of SIDS. The risk was increased further in low birth weight infants, preterm infants, and infants at the age of 13 to 24 weeks, suggesting that SIDS may be triggered by nonsupine sleeping in infants with prenatal risk factors during a vulnerable period of postnatal development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9310514     DOI: 10.1542/peds.100.4.613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  39 in total

1.  Survey of sleeping position recommendations for prematurely born infants on neonatal intensive care unit discharge.

Authors:  Ravindra Y Bhat; Jaana A Leipälä; Gerrard F Rafferty; Simon Hannam; Anne Greenough
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Survey of sleeping position recommendations for prematurely born infants.

Authors:  Nikesh Dattani; Ravindra Bhat; Gerrard F Rafferty; Simon Hannam; Anne Greenough
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Are the risk factors for SIDS different for preterm and term infants?

Authors:  J M D Thompson; E A Mitchell
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Health departments do it better: prenatal care site and prone infant sleep position.

Authors:  Martin B Lahr; Kenneth D Rosenberg; Jodi A Lapidus
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-06

5.  Placing preterm infants for sleep: first prone, then supine.

Authors:  Christian F Poets; Anette von Bodman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  Conceptual and measurement issues in early parenting practices research: an epidemiologic perspective.

Authors:  Lorraine O Walker; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2010-11

Review 7.  How has research in the past 5 years changed my clinical practice.

Authors:  Anne Greenough
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.747

8.  A case-control study of smoking and sudden infant death syndrome in the Scandinavian countries, 1992 to 1995. The Nordic Epidemiological SIDS Study.

Authors:  B Alm; J Milerad; G Wennergren; R Skjaerven; N Oyen; G Norvenius; A K Daltveit; K Helweg-Larsen; T Markestad; L M Irgens
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 9.  GORD in children.

Authors:  Yadlapalli Kumar; Rajini Sarvananthan
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-10-01

10.  Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease and erosive esophagitis in pediatric patients: focus on delayed-release esomeprazole.

Authors:  Elizabet V Guimarães; Paula Vp Guerra; Francisco J Penna
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.