BACKGROUND: To ascertain disease and functional capacity in community-resident disabled older women in the Women's Health and Aging Study (WHAS), a prospective investigation of the causes and course of disability, a home-based standardized physical examination and performance test battery were developed. Thirty-nine tests were administered, 9 by a lay interviewer and 30 by a nurse. This scope and intensity of testing had not been performed previously in a home environment or on such a functionally limited population. Thus, substantial developmental work was required. This report describes the administrative procedures and field experience for each exam component, highlighting innovations pertinent to home administration. METHODS: Exclusion criteria, safety issues, administration time, completion rates, and reasons for incomplete data are reported. Administration time is based on 30 exams conducted over a 3-week period 90% of the way through baseline data collection. Completion status was determined using all 1,002 participants and is categorized as follows: complete; partial; not done, health; not done, other; and refused. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of the screened, eligible respondents completed the 30-min interviewer-administered physical assessment and the 2-hr, 10-min nurse examination. Classifiable data were obtained for 90% of participants on 36 examination items. Lower completion rates were obtained on the other three tests primarily due to exclusions for health-related conditions; environmental constraints and participant refusal were minimal. CONCLUSION: Extensive, research-oriented physical evaluation can be successfully and safely performed in a home setting. In future studies, home-based examination may be preferable, as participation in the WHAS examination substantially exceeded rates for clinic-based exams in similar populations.
BACKGROUND: To ascertain disease and functional capacity in community-resident disabled older women in the Women's Health and Aging Study (WHAS), a prospective investigation of the causes and course of disability, a home-based standardized physical examination and performance test battery were developed. Thirty-nine tests were administered, 9 by a lay interviewer and 30 by a nurse. This scope and intensity of testing had not been performed previously in a home environment or on such a functionally limited population. Thus, substantial developmental work was required. This report describes the administrative procedures and field experience for each exam component, highlighting innovations pertinent to home administration. METHODS: Exclusion criteria, safety issues, administration time, completion rates, and reasons for incomplete data are reported. Administration time is based on 30 exams conducted over a 3-week period 90% of the way through baseline data collection. Completion status was determined using all 1,002 participants and is categorized as follows: complete; partial; not done, health; not done, other; and refused. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of the screened, eligible respondents completed the 30-min interviewer-administered physical assessment and the 2-hr, 10-min nurse examination. Classifiable data were obtained for 90% of participants on 36 examination items. Lower completion rates were obtained on the other three tests primarily due to exclusions for health-related conditions; environmental constraints and participant refusal were minimal. CONCLUSION: Extensive, research-oriented physical evaluation can be successfully and safely performed in a home setting. In future studies, home-based examination may be preferable, as participation in the WHAS examination substantially exceeded rates for clinic-based exams in similar populations.
Authors: Iva Miljkovic; Allison L Kuipers; Jane A Cauley; Tanushree Prasad; Christine G Lee; Kristine E Ensrud; Peggy M Cawthon; Andrew R Hoffman; Thuy-Tien Dam; Christopher L Gordon; Joseph M Zmuda Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Qian Zhao; Joseph M Zmuda; Allison L Kuipers; Clareann H Bunker; Alan L Patrick; Ada O Youk; Iva Miljkovic Journal: Hypertension Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Iva Miljkovic; Jane A Cauley; Moira A Petit; Kristine E Ensrud; Elsa Strotmeyer; Yahtyng Sheu; Christopher L Gordon; Bret H Goodpaster; Clareann H Bunker; Alan L Patrick; Victor W Wheeler; Lewis H Kuller; Kimberly A Faulkner; Joseph M Zmuda Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Carol A Giuliani; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Nan S Park; Lori A Schrodt; Franzi Rokoske; Philip D Sloane; Sheryl Zimmerman Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2008-04
Authors: Linda P Fried; Qian-Li Xue; Anne R Cappola; Luigi Ferrucci; Paulo Chaves; Ravi Varadhan; Jack M Guralnik; Sean X Leng; Richard D Semba; Jeremy D Walston; Caroline S Blaum; Karen Bandeen-Roche Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Ligia J Dominguez; Mario Barbagallo; Fulvio Lauretani; Stefania Bandinelli; Angelo Bos; Anna Maria Corsi; Eleanor M Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Christopher L Seplaki; Emily M Agree; Carlos O Weiss; Sarah L Szanton; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Linda P Fried Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2013-04-24