Literature DB >> 9309744

Modification of patient driving behavior after implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator.

J B Conti1, D A Woodard, K J Tucker, B Bryant, L C King, A B Curtis.   

Abstract

Driving habits among recipients of ICDs have not been well characterized previously, yet such information may have implications for development of national policy. This study was undertaken to characterize driving behavior after defibrillator implantation in our patient population. From 1988-1993, 82 ICDs were implanted at the University of Florida. All patients received defibrillator teaching preoperatively and postoperatively with particular emphasis placed on driving restrictions. A standardized questionnaire was developed to ascertain driving behavior, compliance with restrictions, and occurrence of motor vehicle accidents following implantation. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not they had received a shock from their device since implantation. Group I patients did, and Group II patients did not. Fifty-two out of 82 (63%, Group I) patients had at least one shock. The remaining 30 patients had received no shocks. Mean age and gender were no different between the two groups. Mean time since implantation was 6 +/- 1.3 years in Group I, compared to 4 +/- 1.5 years in Group II (P = 0.001). Forty-seven out of 52 (90%) and 26 out of 30 (87%) in Groups I and II, respectively, resumed driving after defibrillator implantation. There was no difference in the amount of time that passed prior to resumption of driving. Group I patients drove more, 20.5 +/- 27 miles/day compared to patients in Group II, 8.3 +/- 9.7 miles/day (P = 0.02). No patient experienced device discharge during driving; likewise, no patient was involved in a motor vehicle accident secondary to their device firing. Sixty-seven out of 82 (82%) patients complied with the instructions they thought they heard; seven patients in Group I and eight patients in Group II deliberately did not follow our advice. The majority of patients do comply with physician instructions, although the instructions they remember are not always the instructions given. If a national policy is created to prohibit driving after ICD implantation, effective enforcement may be difficult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9309744     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04237.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  4 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations for driving after implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation and the use of a wearable cardioverter defibrillator : Different viewpoints around the world.

Authors:  Mona Cooper; Theresa Berent; Johann Auer; Robert Berent
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Should patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators be allowed to drive? Observations in 291 patients from a single center over an 11-year period.

Authors:  H J Trappe; P Wenzlaff; G Grellman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Driving restrictions for Dutch patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator : Compliance and associated factors.

Authors:  N Jongejan; I Timmermans; J Elders; K Meijer; M Meine; P A Doevendans; H Versteeg; A E Tuinenburg
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Driving following defibrillator implantation: development and pilot results from a nationwide questionnaire.

Authors:  Jenny Bjerre; Simone Hofman Rosenkranz; Anne Mielke Christensen; Morten Schou; Christian Jøns; Gunnar Gislason; Anne-Christine Ruwald
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.298

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.