Literature DB >> 9309557

Aphasia type, age and cerebral infarct localisation.

J M Ferro1, S Madureira.   

Abstract

Stroke patients with nonfluent aphasia tend to be younger than fluent aphasics. We investigated whether this difference was due to an age-related change in the anatomicofunctional organisation of language areas or to an age-dependent variation on the distribution of infarct localisation. From a hospital prospective stroke database we selected those patients who suffered an ischaemic stroke with at least one non-lacunar infarct demonstrated by computed tomography (n = 423 patients). We retrieved information on language disturbance in the acute phase (no aphasia, non-fluent aphasia, fluent aphasia) and on infarct localisation by CT. Non-fluent aphasia predominated in young (aged < 51 years) patients while in elderly patients (aged > 70 years) the opposite was found (chi 2 = 8.03; P = 0.005). Posterior infarcts were also more frequent in elderly patients (chi 2 = 9.9; P = 0.002). There were 27 atypical cases (patients with lesions on language areas without aphasia) and 14 aphasics with atypical infarct localisation (9 fluent aphasics with anterior lesions and 5 non-fluent aphasics with posterior lesions). The proportions of atypical cases, their infarct location or fluency type were not influenced by age. It was concluded that the predominance of fluent aphasia in older patients was related to the higher proportion of posterior infarcts in these patients. The hypothesis of age-related changes in the anatomico-functional organisation of language areas was not supported by the present data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9309557     DOI: 10.1007/s004150050133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  8 in total

Review 1.  Poststroke aphasia : epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment.

Authors:  Marcelo L Berthier
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Predictors of Therapy Response in Chronic Aphasia: Building a Foundation for Personalized Aphasia Therapy.

Authors:  Sigfus Kristinsson; Dirk B den Ouden; Chris Rorden; Roger Newman-Norlund; Jean Neils-Strunjas; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 8.632

Review 3.  Ischaemic stroke in young adults: risk factors and long-term consequences.

Authors:  Noortje A M M Maaijwee; Loes C A Rutten-Jacobs; Pauline Schaapsmeerders; Ewoud J van Dijk; Frank-Erik de Leeuw
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  Ischemia in broca area is associated with broca aphasia more reliably in acute than in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Elisa Ochfeld; Melissa Newhart; John Molitoris; Richard Leigh; Lauren Cloutman; Cameron Davis; Jennifer Crinion; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Use of analgesics in acute stroke patients with inability to self-report pain: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  J Schuster; C Hoyer; A Ebert; A Alonso
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.474

6.  Where are we now with aphasia after Stroke?

Authors:  Pam Enderby; Laura Sutton
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.383

7.  Sex Differences in Presentation of Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mariam Ali; Hendrikus J A van Os; Nelleke van der Weerd; Jan W Schoones; Martijn W Heymans; Nyika D Kruyt; Marieke C Visser; Marieke J H Wermer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Predicting Early Post-stroke Aphasia Outcome From Initial Aphasia Severity.

Authors:  Alberto Osa García; Simona Maria Brambati; Amélie Brisebois; Marianne Désilets-Barnabé; Bérengère Houzé; Christophe Bedetti; Elizabeth Rochon; Carol Leonard; Alex Desautels; Karine Marcotte
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.