Literature DB >> 9309357

Selective processing of shape-related words in women with eating disorders, and those who have recovered.

D M Lovell1, J M Williams, A B Hill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate whether women with anorexia or bulimia nervosa and women who had recovered showed cognitive bias towards shape, food and adolescent issues.
DESIGN: A five-group analysis of variance design was used, in which the different client groups were the independent variables. The dependent variable was performance on an emotional Stroop task.
METHODS: Current anorexia sufferers (N = 31), current bulimia sufferers (N = 24), recovered anorexics (N = 23), recovered bulimics (N = 11) and women who had never suffered from eating disorders (N = 33) were recruited through health-care professionals, support groups and newspapers. Colour-naming times for target and comparison Stroop cards were measured.
RESULTS: Women currently suffering from bulimia, and women who had recovered from anorexia, were found to be more distracted by shape concerns than women who had never suffered eating disorders and women who had recovered from bulimia.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that there may be an enduring cognitive bias among women who have recovered from anorexia. This is the first study in which impairment on an emotional Stroop task has been found to persist after recovery from a clinical condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9309357     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1997.tb01249.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0144-6657


  8 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of attentional biases in disorders involving binge eating.

Authors:  Monika Stojek; Lisa M Shank; Anna Vannucci; Diana M Bongiorno; Eric E Nelson; Andrew J Waters; Scott G Engel; Kerri N Boutelle; Daniel S Pine; Jack A Yanovski; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Selective processing of body image words in women at-risk for developing an eating disorder: a preliminary study.

Authors:  V A Aspen; R I Stein; J Cooperberg; J L Manwaring; D Barch; D E Wilfley
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  Attentional bias in eating disorders.

Authors:  Roz Shafran; Michelle Lee; Zafra Cooper; Robert L Palmer; Christopher G Fairburn
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.861

4.  Deficient activity in the neural systems that mediate self-regulatory control in bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  Rachel Marsh; Joanna E Steinglass; Andrew J Gerber; Kara Graziano O'Leary; Zhishun Wang; David Murphy; B Timothy Walsh; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2009-01

5.  A systematic and methodological review of attentional biases in eating disorders: Food, body, and perfectionism.

Authors:  Christina Ralph-Nearman; Margaret Achee; Rachel Lapidus; Jennifer L Stewart; Ruth Filik
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Psychometric Properties and Validation of the EMOTICOM Test Battery in a Healthy Danish Population.

Authors:  Vibeke H Dam; Christa K Thystrup; Peter S Jensen; Amy R Bland; Erik L Mortensen; Rebecca Elliott; Barbara J Sahakian; Gitte M Knudsen; Vibe G Frokjaer; Dea S Stenbæk
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-03

7.  Neuropsychology of eating disorders: 1995-2012.

Authors:  Ignacio Jáuregui-Lobera
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 2.570

8.  EMOTICOM: A Neuropsychological Test Battery to Evaluate Emotion, Motivation, Impulsivity, and Social Cognition.

Authors:  Amy R Bland; Jonathan P Roiser; Mitul A Mehta; Thea Schei; Heather Boland; Daniel K Campbell-Meiklejohn; Richard A Emsley; Marcus R Munafo; Ian S Penton-Voak; Ana Seara-Cardoso; Essi Viding; Valerie Voon; Barbara J Sahakian; Trevor W Robbins; Rebecca Elliott
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.558

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.