Literature DB >> 9308820

Obstetric and perinatal outcome of children conceived from cryopreserved embryos.

U B Wennerholm1, L Hamberger, L Nilsson, M Wennergren, M Wikland, C Bergh.   

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the obstetric and neonatal outcome of children conceived from cryopreserved embryos. The medical records of 270 infants (163 singletons, 98 twins and nine triplets) were reviewed and compared with two control populations of children born after in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with fresh embryos and children born after spontaneous pregnancies. The controls were matched according to maternal age, parity, plurality and date of delivery. In the cryopreserved group the gestational age at delivery for singletons was 279 +/- 13 days with birthweight 3476 +/- 616 g; for twins gestational age was 257 +/- 19 days with birthweight 2574 +/- 560 g; for triplets gestational age was 228 +/- 3 days with birthweight 1752 +/- 183 g. The incidence of preterm birth (< 37 weeks gestation) was 5.6% for singletons, 44.9% for twins and 100% for triplets. Seven children had major malformations (2.7%) and perinatal mortality occurred in two children (8/1000). Gestational age at delivery, birthweight, the incidence of malformations and the perinatal mortality were comparable with the two control groups both for singletons and twins. Significantly more singletons in the cryopreserved group were delivered by Caesarean section compared with the spontaneous group. The number of infants with low Apgar score (< 7 at 5 min) and the number of infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units were similar in the cryopreserved and spontaneous groups. In conclusion, the cryopreservation process did not seem to adversely influence fetal development and no increased perinatal risk was found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9308820     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/12.8.1819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of early pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen and fresh embryo transfer in ART cycles.

Authors:  Abbas Aflatoonian; Fatemeh Mansoori Moghaddam; Mehri Mashayekhy; Farnaz Mohamadian
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Evidence for Corpus Luteal and Endometrial Origins of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women Conceiving with or Without Assisted Reproduction.

Authors:  Kirk P Conrad
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Birth Outcomes by Infertility Treatment: Analyses of the Population-Based Cohort: Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck; Eugene R Declercq; Marlene Anderka; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.142

Review 4.  Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility?

Authors:  Laxmi A Kondapalli; Alfredo Perales-Puchalt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  Female fertility: is it safe to "freeze?".

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Li-Ying Yan; Xu Zhi; Jie Yan; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Obstetric outcomes after fresh versus frozen-thawed embryo transfers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matheus Roque; Marcello Valle; Marcos Sampaio; Selmo Geber
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2018-09-01

7.  Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nakeisha A Lodge-Tulloch; Flavia T S Elias; Jessica Pudwell; Laura Gaudet; Mark Walker; Graeme N Smith; Maria P Velez
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Chromosome abnormalities and viability of vitrified eight-cell mouse embryos at presence of two different cryoprotectants at different storage durations.

Authors:  Shabnam Zarei Moradi; Anahita Mohseni Meybodi; Hamid Gourabi; Hossein Mozdarani; Zahra Mansouri
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.479

9.  Singleton pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization with fresh or frozen-thawed embryo transfer and incidence of placenta praevia.

Authors:  Sara Korosec; Helena Ban Frangez; Ivan Verdenik; Urska Kladnik; Vanja Kotar; Irma Virant-Klun; Eda Vrtacnik Bokal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Which is better for mothers and babies: fresh or frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer?

Authors:  Meiling Yang; Li Lin; Chunli Sha; Taoqiong Li; Wujiang Gao; Lu Chen; Ying Wu; Yanping Ma; Xiaolan Zhu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.007

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.