Literature DB >> 9308406

Rapid hospital discharge following laparoscopy for ectopic pregnancy. A promise unfulfilled?

L A Learman1, D A Grimes.   

Abstract

This study was done to determine whether laparoscopy for ectopic pregnancy in the United States is associated with rapid postoperative discharge, defined as 2 days or less, and to estimate how often ambulatory treatment of ectopic pregnancy occurs without subsequent hospital admission. We used the National Hospital Discharge Survey to estimate the frequency of ectopic pregnancy admissions, operations, and length of hospital stays in 1990. We used the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to estimate the number, type, and disposition of office visits for ectopic pregnancy in 1990. According to National Hospital Discharge Survey data, tubal pregnancy led to an estimated 57,000 hospital admissions in 1990. Most (70%) of the 26,000 patients treated with laparoscopy were in the hospital 3 days or more, and most (73%) underwent salpingectomy. The number of ambulatory visits for ectopic pregnancy was too low to estimate reliably according to the standards of the National Center for Health Statistics. We found that laparoscopy was used frequently for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy but was not associated with rapid postoperative discharge. Further research is needed to determine whether these findings persist and whether reimbursement incentives, patient preference, or problems with the diffusion of technology are responsible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9308406      PMCID: PMC1304513     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  16 in total

1.  Is salpingostomy the surgical treatment of choice for unruptured tubal pregnancy?

Authors:  M C Rulin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  A cost-effectiveness study of a randomised trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  D T Gray; J Thorburn; P Lundorff; A Strandell; B Lindblom
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Technology assessment in women's health care.

Authors:  M G Munro; R C Reiter; J C Gambone
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Basic laparoscopic knowledge among gynecologic laparoscopists.

Authors:  G H Lipscomb; T G Stovall; F W Ling
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Surveillance for ectopic pregnancy--United States, 1970-1989.

Authors:  T E Goldner; H W Lawson; Z Xia; H K Atrash
Journal:  MMWR CDC Surveill Summ       Date:  1993-12-17

6.  The declining length of hospitalization for tubal sterilization.

Authors:  P M Layde; H W Ory; H B Peterson; M J Scally; J R Greenspan; J C Smith; D Fleming
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Laparoscopic management of ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  C S Ou
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 0.142

8.  Safety of a freestanding surgical unit for the assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  S P Oskowitz; M J Berger; L Mullen; M Smalky; M Alper; I Thompson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 9.  Laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancies: technology assessment and public health implications.

Authors:  F Maruri; R Azziz
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Methotrexate therapy. Nonsurgical management of ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  J L Slaughter; D A Grimes
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1995-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  Hospital resources used for ectopic pregnancy treatment by laparoscopy and methotrexate.

Authors:  F Lecuru; S Camatte; C Viens-Bitker; S Chasset; F Leonard; R Taurelle
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.