Literature DB >> 9306782

Fourth national pressure ulcer prevalence survey.

C A Barczak, R I Barnett, E J Childs, L M Bosley.   

Abstract

The fourth national pressure ulcer prevalence survey was conducted on November 9, 1995, with stuff at 265 acute-care hospitals surveying 39,874 patients for the presence of pressure ulcers. Data were collected on patient demographics, ulcer site, ulcer stage, and support surface. The goal was to determine the aggregate prevalence of pressure ulcers and to compare the results to those of the previous three surveys. The overall prevalence was 10.1% (range 1.4% to 36.4%), with the sacrum and heels the most common pressure ulcer sites. The predominant age group of patients with pressure ulcers was 71 to 80 years. Seventy-four percent of pressure ulcers were superficial (i.e., Stages I and II). The national pressure ulcer prevalence has remained relatively constant throughout the four surveys, despite the many changes in health care over the past 7 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9306782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Wound Care        ISSN: 1076-2191            Impact factor:   4.730


  11 in total

1.  Pressure-redistributing support surface use and pressure ulcer incidence in elderly hip fracture patients.

Authors:  Shayna E Rich; Michelle Shardell; William G Hawkes; David J Margolis; Sania Amr; Ram Miller; Mona Baumgarten
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Implementation of best practice in the prevention of heel pressure ulcers in the acute orthopedic population.

Authors:  Karen E Campbell; M Gail Woodbury; Pamela E Houghton
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  The relationship of pressure ulcers, race, and socioeconomic conditions after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Lee L Saunders; James S Krause; Bridget A Peters; Karla S Reed
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Pressure Ulcers in Admitted Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Mustafa Qazi; Almas F Khattak; Muhammad T Barki
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-20

5.  Predictors of pressure ulcer recurrence in veterans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Marylou Guihan; Susan L Garber; Charles H Bombardier; Barry Goldstein; Sally A Holmes; Lishan Cao
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Use of dynamic wound closure system in conjunction with vacuum-assisted closure therapy in delayed closure of open abdomen.

Authors:  A E Salman; F Yetişir; M Aksoy; M Tokaç; M B Yildirim; M Kiliç
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Delayed primary closure of the septic open abdomen with a dynamic closure system.

Authors:  Froukje J Verdam; Dennis E J G J Dolmans; Maarten J Loos; Menno H Raber; Ralph J de Wit; Jan A Charbon; Jos P A M Vroemen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Lower extremity function following partial calcanectomy in high-risk limb salvage patients.

Authors:  Noah G Oliver; John S Steinberg; Kelly Powers; Karen K Evans; Paul J Kim; Christopher E Attinger
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.011

9.  Long-term morbidities in stroke survivors: a prospective multicenter study of Thai stroke rehabilitation registry.

Authors:  Vilai Kuptniratsaikul; Apichana Kovindha; Sumalee Suethanapornkul; Nuttaset Manimmanakorn; Yingsumal Archongka
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 10.  Prevalence of foot disease and risk factors in general inpatient populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peter A Lazzarini; Sheree E Hurn; Malindu E Fernando; Scott D Jen; Suzanne S Kuys; Maarten C Kamp; Lloyd F Reed
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.