Literature DB >> 9306169

The relation between age at the time of cochlear implantation and long-term speech perception abilities in congenitally deaf subjects.

A F Snik1, M J Makhdoum, A M Vermeulen, J P Brokx, P van den Broek.   

Abstract

The issue of whether an upper age limit should be set for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf subjects has often been debated. To gain more insight, the speech perception abilities were analyzed of 12 congenitally deaf subjects whose age at the time of cochlear implantation ranged from 4 to 33 years. Subjects implanted during adulthood only showed progress during the first few months after the speech processor had been fitted and their long-term results were poor compared to those of children implanted early in life. This latter group showed steady improvement over the whole evaluation period. The present results support the notion that the earlier in life implantation is performed, the better the development of speech perception. Based on the progress-over-time profiles and data on actual daily use of the cochlear implant, it can be suggested that implantation of congenitally deaf subjects during or after puberty offers only limited benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9306169     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-5876(97)00058-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  9 in total

1.  Late Cochlear Implantation in Early-Deafened Adults: A Detailed Analysis of Auditory and Self-Perceived Benefits.

Authors:  Joke Debruyne; Miranda Janssen; Jan Brokx
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Bilateral effects of unilateral cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf cats.

Authors:  Jahn N O'Neil; Charles J Limb; Christa A Baker; David K Ryugo
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 3.  Cochlear implants and spoken language processing abilities: review and assessment of the literature.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Peterson; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  The Effect of Age at Cochlear Implantation on Speech and Auditory Performances in Prelingually Deaf Children.

Authors:  Neha Shakrawal; Nishi Sonkhya; Sunita Agarwal; Mohnish Grover
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-02-20

Review 5.  Cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual deafness. Part II. Underlying constraints that affect audiological outcomes.

Authors:  Su Wooi Teoh; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual deafness. Part I. Clinical results.

Authors:  Su Wooi Teoh; David B Pisoni; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Categories of auditory performance and speech intelligibility ratings of early-implanted children without speech training.

Authors:  Huiqun Zhou; Zhengnong Chen; Haibo Shi; Yaqin Wu; Shankai Yin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Timing of surgical intervention with cochlear implant in patients with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome.

Authors:  Hui-Chen Ko; Tien-Chen Liu; Li-Ang Lee; Wei-Chieh Chao; Yung-Ting Tsou; Shu-Hang Ng; Che-Ming Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Audiovisual spoken word training can promote or impede auditory-only perceptual learning: prelingually deafened adults with late-acquired cochlear implants versus normal hearing adults.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Silvio P Eberhardt; Edward T Auer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.