Literature DB >> 9305553

Epidural analgesia for labour and delivery: informed consent issues.

C Pattee1, M Ballantyne, B Milne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many anaesthetists believe that informed consent for epidural analgesia during labour is inadequate. Patients are perceived to be poorly informed and unable to cope with the information given during labour for informed consent. We reviewed these two hypotheses: A) to define complications for which patients want clear information: B) to quantify the influence of pain, anxiety, opioid premedication, and the importance of level of education, on a patient's level of satisfaction with regard to the consent process: and C) to assess how satisfactory epidural pain relief correlates with satisfaction with the consent process.
METHODS: Sixty patients were surveyed during the first two months after vaginal delivery by two interviewers. Questions related to demographics, severity of labour pain, level of satisfaction with the epidural anaesthetic, risk of complications and satisfaction with information received were either categorical or scored on a scale from 0 to 10.
RESULTS: All epidural related complications were considered important to disclose (8.4/10). The level of satisfaction with the consent process was 8.1/10. Patient satisfaction was not affected by opioid premedication, anxiety, pain score, education group or level of pain relief.
CONCLUSION: Patients indicated they should be informed of all possible complications associated with epidural analgesia, regardless of severity or risk. In contrast to reports in the literature, non disclosure of serious risks during labour was not acceptable to parturients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9305553     DOI: 10.1007/BF03011961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  7 in total

1.  Childbirth with labor analgesia. What is important to our patients?

Authors:  Krzysztof M Kuczkowski
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  What do patients really want to know in an informed consent procedure? A questionnaire-based survey of patients in the Bath area, UK.

Authors:  H El-Wakeel; G J Taylor; J J T Tate
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet.

Authors:  Camille H Raynes-Greenow; Natasha Nassar; Siranda Torvaldsen; Lyndal Trevena; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  A survey on informed consent process for epidural analgesia in labor pain in Korea.

Authors:  Nan-Ju Lee; Jiyeon Sim; Mi Soon Lee; Wonsik Ahn; Sun Sook Han; Hwa Mi Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-07-21

5.  The perils of protection: vulnerability and women in clinical research.

Authors:  Toby Schonfeld
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2013-06

6.  Satisfaction in parturients receiving epidural analgesia after prenatal shared decision-making intervention: a prospective, before-and-after cohort study.

Authors:  Wan-Jung Cheng; Kuo-Chuan Hung; Chung-Han Ho; Chia-Hung Yu; Yi-Chen Chen; Ming-Ping Wu; Chin-Chen Chu; Ying-Jen Chang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Perceptions and practice of epidural analgesia among women attending antenatal clinic in FETHA.

Authors:  Paul O Ezeonu; Okechukwu Bonaventure Anozie; Fidelis A Onu; Chidi U Esike; Johnbosco E Mamah; Lucky O Lawani; Robinson C Onoh; Emmanuel Okechukwu Ndukwe; Richard Lawrence Ewah; Rita Onyinyechi Anozie
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-12-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.