Literature DB >> 9302135

Outcome based staging for clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

A V D'Amico1, R Whittington, D Schultz, S B Malkowicz, J E Tomaszewski, A Wein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Some patients with clinically localized prostate cancer are not cured after radical prostatectomy because of the presence of occult systemic disease. The American Joint Commission on Cancer staging classification for prostate cancer does not reliably distinguish between clinically localized patients who are likely or unlikely to be cured after local therapy. This project was undertaken to develop a staging system capable of predicting long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy on the basis of the clinical parameters obtained routinely during the standard workup for patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 688 clinically localized prostate cancer patients managed with a radical retropubic prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate between 1989 and 1996 was evaluated for clinical features predictive of time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure using a Cox regression multivariate analysis. A recently defined clinical factor called the calculated prostate cancer volume and its ability to predict time to PSA failure in conjunction with PSA, biopsy Gleason score and clinical stage were evaluated.
RESULTS: The calculated prostate cancer volume (p <0.0001) and the pretreatment PSA (p <0.001) provided the optimal staging system for predicting freedom from PSA failure after radical prostatectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: The calculated prostate cancer volume and PSA may provide clinically useful information regarding outcome after radical prostatectomy, enabling the selection of a therapeutic approach for an individual patient with clinically localized disease. Validation of this staging system is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9302135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

Review 1.  Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: what are the results and how safe is it?

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer patients: the additional value depends on preoperative data.

Authors:  Caroline Rousseau; Thierry Rousseau; Cédric Mathieu; Jacques Lacoste; Eric Potiron; Geneviève Aillet; Pierre Nevoux; Georges Le Coguic; Loïc Campion; Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on the Radiotherapeutic Approach to Prostate Cancer in Comparison to CT: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann; Chukwuka Eze; Minglun Li; Paul Rogowski; Christian Schaefer; Christian Stief; Alexander Buchner; Constantinos Zamboglou; Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Ute Ganswindt; Clemens Cyran; Peter Bartenstein; Claus Belka; Harun Ilhan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Early diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael K Brawer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

5.  Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node (SLN) versus extensive pelvic dissection for clinically localized prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Caroline Rousseau; Thierry Rousseau; Boumédiène Bridji; Amandine Pallardy; Jacques Lacoste; Loïc Campion; Aude Testard; Geneviève Aillet; Ayat Mouaden; Chantal Curtet; Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  The effect of androgen deprivation therapy on 68Ga-PSMA tracer uptake in non-metastatic prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Cem Onal; Ozan Cem Guler; Nese Torun; Mehmet Reyhan; Ali Fuat Yapar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Reducing radiation-associated toxicity using online image guidance (IGRT) in prostate cancer patients undergoing dose-escalated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Martina Becker-Schiebe; Ali Abaci; Tahera Ahmad; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-02-20

Review 8.  'Race' and prostate cancer mortality in equal-access healthcare systems.

Authors:  Tisheeka Graham-Steed; Edward Uchio; Carolyn K Wells; Mihaela Aslan; John Ko; John Concato
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-PET imaging on target volume definition and guidelines in radiation oncology - a patterns of failure analysis in patients with primary diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  K Schiller; M Devecka; T Maurer; M Eiber; J Gschwend; M Schwaiger; S E Combs; G Habl
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  A critical comparison of techniques for MRI-targeted biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  Francesco Giganti; Caroline M Moore
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.