Literature DB >> 9302064

Femoropopliteal bypass: in situ or reversed vein grafts? Ten-year results of a randomized prospective study.

J Watelet1, P Soury, J F Menard, D Plissonnier, C Peillon, J P Lestrat, J Testart.   

Abstract

One hundred femoropopliteal bypass procedures performed in 91 patients between October 1980 and January 1985 were randomly divided into two statistically comparable groups including 50 in situ vein grafts and 50 reversed vein grafts. The indication for bypass was chronic critical ischemia in 97% of cases. The lower anastomosis was made on the distal popliteal artery in 75% of cases. Follow-up ranged from 10 years (for the last patient included) to 14 years. Three patients have been lost to follow-up. Median survival was 54 months in the in situ graft group and 76.5 months in the reversed graft group. Actuarial survival at 10 years was 30.8% in the in situ graft group and 29.5% in the reversed graft group. Actuarial limb salvage at 10 years was 73.5% in the in situ graft group and 74.4% in the reversed graft group. Graft occlusion was observed in 10 cases during the perioperative period (six in the in situ graft group and four in the reversed graft group) and in 19 cases during the late postoperative period (12 in the in situ graft group and seven in the reversed graft group). Reoperation during follow-up was required in 13 cases in the in situ graft group (11 patients) and in nine cases in the reversed graft group (five patients). Discounting residual arteriovenous fistulas (FAV) (five ligations in four patients), the incidence of lesions involving the bypass and anastomoses threatening graft patency was 6% in the in situ graft group and 8% in the reversed graft group. Actuarial primary patency at 10 years was 41.7% in the in situ graft group and 64.5% in the reversed graft group (p < 0.05). Actuarial secondary patency at 10 years was 64.8% in the in situ graft group and 70.2% in the reversed graft group (NS). As a function of vein diameter, actuarial secondary patency at 10 years in the in situ graft group was 37.5% for bypasses using veins with a diameter of 4 mm or less and 80.6% for bypasses using veins larger than 4 mm (p < 0.05). In the reversed graft group the patency rate was 71.2% for bypasses using veins with a diameter of 4 mm or less and 65.5% for bypasses using veins larger than 4 mm. In addition to requiring a training period the in situ technique raises the problem of valve removal especially for small diameter veins. The absence of these disadvantages makes the reversed technique the procedure of choice for femoropopliteal bypass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9302064     DOI: 10.1007/s100169900083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  10 in total

Review 1.  The dynamic vasa vasorum.

Authors:  Erik L Ritman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 10.787

2.  Lifelong limb preservation: A patient-centered description of lower extremity arterial reconstruction outcomes.

Authors:  Katie E Shean; Peter A Soden; Marc L Schermerhorn; Sara L Zettervall; Sarah E Deery; Jeremy D Darling; Allen Hamdan; Frank W LoGerfo
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Basic data related to surgical infrainguinal revascularization procedures: a twenty year update.

Authors:  Kenneth R Ziegler; Akihito Muto; Sammy D D Eghbalieh; Alan Dardik
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.466

4.  Matrix metalloproteinases and risk stratification in patients undergoing surgical revascularisation for critical limb ischaemia.

Authors:  Giovanni De Caridi; Mafalda Massara; Francesco Spinelli; Antonio David; Sebastiano Gangemi; Francesco Fugetto; Raffaele Grande; Lucia Butrico; Roberta Stefanelli; Manuela Colosimo; Stefano de Franciscis; Raffaele Serra
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Three-month cumulative incidence of thromboembolism and bleeding after periprocedural anticoagulation management of arterial vascular bypass patients.

Authors:  Hosam Attaya; Waldemar E Wysokinski; Thomas Bower; Scott Litin; Paul R Daniels; Joshua Slusser; John A Heit; Robert D McBane
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Graft type for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery.

Authors:  Graeme K Ambler; Christopher P Twine
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-11

7.  Current review with evolving management strategies in critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Arun Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2019-10-30

Review 8.  Current Status of Cell-Based Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia.

Authors:  Frantisek Jaluvka; Peter Ihnat; Juraj Madaric; Adela Vrtkova; Jaroslav Janosek; Vaclav Prochazka
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Lower extremity aneurysmal degeneration of great saphenous venous allograft bypass in an adolescent boy.

Authors:  Nicole Gensicke; Rachael Nicholson; William Sharp
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2021-10-21

10.  Revascularization Techniques for Limb Salvage in Critical Limb Ischemia: A Single Institutional Study From Pakistan.

Authors:  Tehreem Kazmi; Faiza H Soomro; Mehwish Ansar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.