Literature DB >> 9301699

Comparison of perspectives on prostate cancer: analyses of survey data.

E D Crawford1, C L Bennett, N N Stone, S J Knight, E DeAntoni, L Sharp, M B Garnick, H A Porterfield.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer will account for 334,500 new cases and 41,800 deaths among men in the United States in 1997. Patients and physicians are faced with many concerns related to benefits and side effects of alternative treatments, educational needs, emotional support, and costs of care. Support groups for prostate cancer patients have been established to help satisfy needs in these areas. Therefore, we addressed three issues among patients who belong to a prostate cancer support group as well as among a second group of urologists who treat prostate cancer: (1) goals for prostate cancer treatment, (2) information that is given and recalled about the disease and therapy, and (3) extent to which educational and emotional needs are being met.
METHODS: Random telephone surveys were made of 1000 men with prostate cancer who belong to the prostate cancer support group US TOO, the largest prostate cancer support group in the United States, and 200 urologists who provide care to men with prostate cancer. The surveys were conducted by the Louis Harris & Associates survey research firm.
RESULTS: About four fifths of patients and urologists prefer aggressive therapy for prostate cancer. Patient goals with therapy included preservation of quality of life (45%), extension of life (29%), and delaying disease progression (13%), whereas physicians overwhelmingly focused on treatment efficacy (86%), with side effects (43%) and costs (29%) being secondary considerations. Urologists and patients differed markedly in the description of the patient-physician discussion. Whereas almost 100% of physicians stated that they always discussed important considerations such as options for no therapy, life expectancy with and without therapy, patient preferences, costs, and changes in sexual function, only about one fifth of patients recalled similar discussions. Patients and physicians both believed that physicians were an excellent source of educational support, but often did not report provision of emotional support. Although support groups were viewed as good providers of educational and emotional support by 85% to 90% of patients, physicians appeared to underestimate the benefit of support groups in these areas.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who belong to US TOO have many emotional and educational needs that are not currently being fulfilled by physicians. Although the goals of therapy are viewed similarly by patients and physicians, much of the important cancer- and treatment-related information that physicians report they have provided is not recalled by patients. Policy makers would be wise to devise systematic strategies such as shared decision-making tools and better linkages to support groups to ensure that patients' needs are being met.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9301699     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00254-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  22 in total

1.  Exploring the efficacy of support groups for men with prostrate cancer.

Authors:  B A Weber; B L Roberts; G J McDougall
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.361

2.  Who is responsible? The role of family physicians in the provision of supportive cancer care.

Authors:  Kevin Brazil; Jonathan Sussman; Daryl Bainbridge; Tim Whelan
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Patient Decision Making Prior to Radical Prostatectomy: What Is and Is Not Involved.

Authors:  Çağatay Doğan; Hamza M Gültekin; Sarper M Erdoğan; Hamdi Özkara; Zübeyr Talat; Ahmet N Erözenci; Can Öbek
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-09-21

4.  A survey of patient expectations regarding sexual function following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Serkan Deveci; Geoffrey T Gotto; Byron Alex; Keith O'Brien; John P Mulhall
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-01-17       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Differential diagnosis of prostate lesions with the use of biomagnetic measurements and non-linear analysis.

Authors:  P Anninos; I Papadopoulos; A Kotini; A Adamopoulos
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-02-18

Review 6.  Problems for clinical judgement: 5. Principles of influence in medical practice.

Authors:  Donald A Redelmeier; Robert B Cialdini
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Active surveillance and radical therapy in prostate cancer: can focal therapy offer the middle way?

Authors:  Hashim Uddin Ahmed; Mark Emberton
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  What's a man to do? Treatment options for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tom Pickles
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 9.  Sonic hedgehog, apoptosis, and the penis.

Authors:  Carol A Podlasek
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 10.  Men's and carers' experiences of care for prostate cancer: a narrative literature review.

Authors:  Paul Sinfield; Richard Baker; Janette Camosso-Stefinovic; Andrew M Colman; Carolyn Tarrant; John K Mellon; William Steward; Roger Kockelbergh; Shona Agarwal
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.