Literature DB >> 9301060

Speech intelligibility enhancement using hearing-aid array processing.

G H Saunders1, J M Kates.   

Abstract

Microphone arrays can improve speech recognition in the noise for hearing-impaired listeners by suppressing interference coming from other than desired signal direction. In a previous paper [J. M. Kates and M. R. Weiss, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 3138-3148 (1996)], several array-processing techniques were evaluated in two rooms using the AI-weighted array gain as the performance metric. The array consisted of five omnidirectional microphones having uniform 2.5-cm spacing, oriented in the endfire direction. In this paper, the speech intelligibility for two of the array processing techniques, delay-and-sum beamforming and superdirective processing, is evaluated for a group of hearing-impaired subjects. Speech intelligibility was measured using the speech reception threshold (SRT) for spondees and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) for sentence materials. The array performance is compared with that for a single omnidirectional microphone and a single directional microphone having a cardioid response pattern. The SRT and SIR results show that the superdirective array processing was the most effective, followed by the cardioid microphone, the array using delay-and-sum beamforming, and the single omnidirectional microphone. The relative processing ratings do not appear to be strongly affected by the size of the room, and the SRT values determined using isolated spondees are similar to the SIR values produced from continuous discourse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9301060     DOI: 10.1121/1.420107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Examination of a hybrid beamformer that preserves auditory spatial cues.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evaluation of different signal processing options in unilateral and bilateral cochlear freedom implant recipients using R-Space background noise.

Authors:  Alison M Brockmeyer; Lisa G Potts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  The Benefit of a Visually Guided Beamformer in a Dynamic Speech Task.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Timothy Streeter; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Benefits of Beamforming With Local Spatial-Cue Preservation for Speech Localization and Segregation.

Authors:  Le Wang; Virginia Best; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Speech recognition with a hearing-aid processing scheme combining beamforming with mask-informed speech enhancement.

Authors:  Tim Green; Gaston Hilkhuysen; Mark Huckvale; Stuart Rosen; Mike Brookes; Alastair Moore; Patrick Naylor; Leo Lightburn; Wei Xue
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Optimizing the use of acoustic materials in office buildings.

Authors:  Abdullah AlOmani; Khaled El-Rayes; Ayman Altuwaim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Anatomical and Functional MRI Changes after One Year of Auditory Rehabilitation with Hearing Aids.

Authors:  M R Pereira-Jorge; K C Andrade; F X Palhano-Fontes; P R B Diniz; M Sturzbecher; A C Santos; D B Araujo
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.