Literature DB >> 9301055

Increment and decrement detection in sinusoids as a measure of temporal resolution.

A J Oxenham1.   

Abstract

Measuring thresholds for the detection of brief decrements in the level of a sinusoid is an established method of estimating auditory temporal resolution. Generally, a background noise is added to the stimulus to avoid the detection of the "spectral splatter" introduced by the decrement. Results are often described in terms of a temporal-window model, comprising a band-pass filter, a compressive nonlinearity, a sliding temporal integrator, and a decision device. In this study, thresholds for increments, as well as decrements, in the level of a 55 dB SPL, 4-kHz sinusoidal pedestal were measured as function of increment and decrement duration in the presence of a broadband background noise ranging in spectrum level from -20 to +20 dB SPL. Thresholds were also measured using a 55-dB, 8-kHz pedestal in the absence of background noise. Thresholds for decrements, in terms of the dB change in level (delta L), were found to be more dependent on duration than those for increments. Also, performance was found to be dependent on background-noise level over most levels tested. Neither finding is consistent with the predictions of the temporal-window model or other similar models of temporal resolution. The difference between increment and decrement detection was more successfully simulated by using a decision criterion based on the maximum slope of the temporal-window output.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9301055     DOI: 10.1121/1.420086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  The effect of narrow-band noise maskers on increment detection.

Authors:  Jessica J Messersmith; Harisadhan Patra; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of external noise on detection of intensity increments.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Kim S Schairer; Lance Nizami; Samar Khaddam; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Relative effects of increment and pedestal duration on the detection of intensity increments.

Authors:  Daniel L Valente; Harisadhan Patra; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Factors affecting the processing of intensity in school-aged children.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Temporal Resolution of the Normal Ear in Listeners with Unilateral Hearing Impairment.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Ratul Dey; Jai Lal Davessar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-22

6.  Tuning of human modulation filters is carrier-frequency dependent.

Authors:  Andrew J R Simpson; Joshua D Reiss; David McAlpine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Cortico-Collicular Amplification Mechanism for Gap Detection.

Authors:  Aldis P Weible; Iryna Yavorska; Michael Wehr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  The dynamic range paradox: a central auditory model of intensity change detection.

Authors:  Andrew J R Simpson; Joshua D Reiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.