Literature DB >> 9300983

The sensitivity of biological tissue to ultrasound.

S B Barnett1, H D Rott, G R ter Haar, M C Ziskin, K Maeda.   

Abstract

Mammalian tissues have differing sensitivities to damage by physical agents such as ultrasound. This article evaluates the scientific data in terms of known physical mechanisms of interaction and the impact on pre- and postnatal tissues. Actively dividing cells of the embryonic and fetal central nervous system are most readily disturbed. As a diagnostic ultrasound beam envelopes a small volume of tissue, it is possible that the effects of mild disturbance may not be detected unless major neural pathways are involved. There is evidence that ultrasound can be detected by the central nervous system; however, this does not necessarily imply that the bioeffect is hazardous to the fetus. Biologically significant temperature increases can occur at or near to bone in the fetus from the second trimester, if the beam is held stationary for more than 30 s in some pulsed Doppler applications. In this way, sensory organs that are encased in bone may be susceptible to heating by conduction. Reports in animals and humans of retarded growth and development following frequent exposures to diagnostic ultrasound, in the absence of significant heating, are difficult to explain from the current knowledge of ultrasound mechanisms. There is no evidence of cavitation effects occurring in the soft tissues of the fetus when exposed to diagnostic ultrasound; however, the possibility exists that such effects may be enhanced by the introduction of echo-contrast agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9300983     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(97)00027-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  15 in total

Review 1.  Review of technology: planning for the development of telesonography.

Authors:  Matthew J Bassignani; Samuel J Dwyer; Jonathan M Ciambotti; Juan M Olazagasti; Ruth Moran; Sean Moynihan; Alfred C Weaver; Andrew M Snyder
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Forced wave motion with internal and boundary damping.

Authors:  Tobias Louw; Scott Whitney; Anu Subramanian; Hendrik Viljoen
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Are ultrasound-guided ophthalmic blocks injurious to the eye? A comparative rabbit model study of two ultrasound devices evaluating intraorbital thermal and structural changes.

Authors:  Howard D Palte; Steven Gayer; Esdras Arrieta; Eric Scot Shaw; Izuru Nose; Elizabete Lee; Kristopher L Arheart; Sander Dubovy; David J Birnbach; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Thermal safety of ultrasound-enhanced ocular drug delivery: A modeling study.

Authors:  Marjan Nabili; Craig Geist; Vesna Zderic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Ultrasound increases nanoparticle delivery by reducing intratumoral pressure and increasing transport in epithelial and epithelial-mesenchymal transition tumors.

Authors:  Katherine D Watson; Chun-Yen Lai; Shengping Qin; Dustin E Kruse; Yueh-Chen Lin; Jai Woong Seo; Robert D Cardiff; Lisa M Mahakian; Julie Beegle; Elizabeth S Ingham; Fitz-Roy Curry; Rolf K Reed; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Ultrasonic drug delivery--a general review.

Authors:  William G Pitt; Ghaleb A Husseini; Bryant J Staples
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.648

Review 7.  Therapeutic potential of low-intensity ultrasound (part 1): thermal and sonomechanical effects.

Authors:  Loreto B Feril; Katsuro Tachibana; Koichi Ogawa; Kazuki Yamaguchi; Ivan G Solano; Yutaka Irie
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 1.314

8.  The antivascular action of physiotherapy ultrasound on murine tumors.

Authors:  Andrew K W Wood; Sara Ansaloni; Lisa S Ziemer; William M-F Lee; Michael D Feldman; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Insonation of targeted microbubbles produces regions of reduced blood flow within tumor vasculature.

Authors:  Xiaowen Hu; Azadeh Kheirolomoom; Lisa M Mahakian; Julie R Beegle; Dustin E Kruse; Kit S Lam; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 10.  Physical energy for drug delivery; poration, concentration and activation.

Authors:  Shanmugamurthy Lakshmanan; Gaurav K Gupta; Pinar Avci; Rakkiyappan Chandran; Magesh Sadasivam; Ana Elisa Serafim Jorge; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.