BACKGROUND: Patients who present with chest pain but have normal coronary angiography and who are told by their cardiologist that they do not have heart disease, have a poor symptomatic, psychological and quality of life outcome and remain concerned about a serious cause of their symptoms. They frequently complain they have not had enough information. The study aimed to test the effectiveness and acceptability of a brief psychological intervention based on cognitive behavioural principles. METHODS:Consecutive patients with chest pain and normal angiograms were assessed and invited to take part in a randomized controlled evaluation. The intervention consisted of an individualized information and discussion session by a specially trained cardiac nurse, together with a handout and cassette providing information and advice and telephone follow-up to discuss progress, answer questions and reiterate advice. RESULTS: The treatment proved to be unacceptable to some patients and there was no evidence of efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Implications for the preparation of patients undergoing angiography and for the timing and delivery of information and advice following a negative result are discussed.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Patients who present with chest pain but have normal coronary angiography and who are told by their cardiologist that they do not have heart disease, have a poor symptomatic, psychological and quality of life outcome and remain concerned about a serious cause of their symptoms. They frequently complain they have not had enough information. The study aimed to test the effectiveness and acceptability of a brief psychological intervention based on cognitive behavioural principles. METHODS: Consecutive patients with chest pain and normal angiograms were assessed and invited to take part in a randomized controlled evaluation. The intervention consisted of an individualized information and discussion session by a specially trained cardiac nurse, together with a handout and cassette providing information and advice and telephone follow-up to discuss progress, answer questions and reiterate advice. RESULTS: The treatment proved to be unacceptable to some patients and there was no evidence of efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Implications for the preparation of patients undergoing angiography and for the timing and delivery of information and advice following a negative result are discussed.
Authors: Robert C Smith; Catherine Lein; Clare Collins; Judith S Lyles; Barbara Given; Francesca C Dwamena; John Coffey; AnneMarie Hodges; Joseph C Gardiner; John Goddeeris; C William Given Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Paul I Musey; Fernanda Bellolio; Suneel Upadhye; Anna Marie Chang; Deborah B Diercks; Michael Gottlieb; Erik P Hess; Michael C Kontos; Bryn E Mumma; Marc A Probst; John H Stahl; Jason P Stopyra; Jeffrey A Kline; Christopher R Carpenter Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 5.221
Authors: Karl-Heinz Ladwig; Florian Lederbogen; Christian Albus; Christiane Angermann; Martin Borggrefe; Denise Fischer; Kurt Fritzsche; Markus Haass; Jochen Jordan; Jana Jünger; Ingrid Kindermann; Volker Köllner; Bernhard Kuhn; Martin Scherer; Melchior Seyfarth; Heinz Völler; Christiane Waller; Christoph Herrmann-Lingen Journal: Ger Med Sci Date: 2014-05-07