Literature DB >> 9300354

On the recording of sample times and parameter estimation from repeated measures pharmacokinetic data.

H Sun1, E I Ette, T M Ludden.   

Abstract

A pharmacokinetic screen has been advocated for the characterization of the population pharmacokinetics of drugs during Phase 3 clinical trials. A common perception encountered in the collection of such data is that the accuracy of sampling times relative to dose is inadequate. A prospective simulation study was carried out to evaluate the effect of error in the recording of sampling times on the accuracy and precision of population parameter estimates from repeated measures pharmacokinetic data. A two-compartment model with intravenous bolus input(s) (single and multiple doses) was assumed. Random and systematic error in sampling times ranging from 5-50% using profile (block) randomized design were introduced. Sampling times were simulated in EXCEL while concentration data simulation and analysis were done in NONMEM. The effect of error in sampling times was studied at levels of variability ranging from 15-45% for a drug assumed to be dosed at its elimination half-life. One hundred replicate data sets of 100 subjects each were simulated for each case. Although estimates of clearance (CL) and variability in clearance were robust for most of the sampling time errors, there was an increase in bias and imprecision in overall parameter estimation as intersubject variability was increased. If there is interest in parameters other than CL, then the design of prospective population studies should include procedures for minimizing the error in the recording of sample times relative to dosing history.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9300354     DOI: 10.1007/BF02353484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  8 in total

1.  Experimental design and efficient parameter estimation in population pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  M K al-Banna; A W Kelman; B Whiting
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1990-08

2.  An evaluation of point and interval estimates in population pharmacokinetics using NONMEM analysis.

Authors:  D B White; C A Walawander; Y Tung; T H Grasela
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1991-02

3.  The influence of assay variability on pharmacokinetic parameter estimation.

Authors:  D A Graves; C S Locke; K T Muir; R P Miller
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1989-10

4.  The clinical investigation of drugs for use by the elderly: Food and Drug guidelines.

Authors:  R Temple
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Experimental design and efficient parameter estimation in preclinical pharmacokinetic studies.

Authors:  E I Ette; C A Howie; A W Kelman; B Whiting
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. III. Monoexponential model: routine clinical pharmacokinetic data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1983-06

7.  Interpretation of simulation studies for efficient estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  E I Ette; A W Kelman; C A Howie; B Whiting
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Designs for population pharmacodynamics: value of pharmacokinetic data and population analysis.

Authors:  Y Hashimoto; L B Sheiner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1991-06
  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Designing population pharmacokinetic studies: performance of mixed designs.

Authors:  E O Fadiran; C D Jones; E I Ette
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000 Jul-Dec       Impact factor: 2.441

2.  Design and power of a population pharmacokinetic study.

Authors:  P I Lee
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Population pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine in elderly patients.

Authors:  Baralee Punyawudho; Eugene R Ramsay; Richard C Brundage; Flavia M Macias; Joseph F Collins; Angela K Birnbaum
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation of epirubicin clearance by limited sampling.

Authors:  Lorraine D Ralph; Alison H Thomson; Nicola A Dobbs; Chris Twelves
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  A pragmatic approach to the design of population pharmacokinetic studies.

Authors:  Amit Roy; Ene I Ette
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 6.  Pharmacodynamic parameter estimation: population size versus number of samples.

Authors:  Suzette Girgis; Sudhakar M Pai; Ihab G Girgis; Vijay K Batra
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Population pharmacodynamic parameter estimation from sparse sampling: effect of sigmoidicity on parameter estimates.

Authors:  Sudhakar M Pai; Suzette Girgis; Vijay K Batra; Ihab G Girgis
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 8.  Population pharmacokinetics. A regulatory perspective.

Authors:  H Sun; E O Fadiran; C D Jones; L Lesko; S M Huang; K Higgins; C Hu; S Machado; S Maldonado; R Williams; M Hossain; E I Ette
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Evaluation and optimisation of current milrinone prescribing for the treatment and prevention of low cardiac output syndrome in paediatric patients after open heart surgery using a physiology-based pharmacokinetic drug-disease model.

Authors:  Winnie Vogt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Population pharmacokinetic modeling of steady state carbamazepine clearance in children, adolescents, and adults.

Authors:  D M Reith; W D Hooper; J Parke; B Charles
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.