Literature DB >> 9299716

In situ microcosms in aquifer bioremediation studies.

R T Mandelbaum1, M R Shati, D Ronen.   

Abstract

The extent to which aquifer microbiota can be studied under laboratory or simulated conditions is limited by our inability to authentically duplicate natural conditions in the laboratory. Therefore, extrapolation of laboratory results to real aquifer situations is often criticized, unless validation of the data is performed in situ. Reliable data acquisition is critical for the estimation of chemical and biological reaction rates of biodegradation processes in groundwater and as input data for mathematical models. Typically, in situ geobiochemical studies relied on the injection of groundwater spiked with compounds or bacteria of interest into the aquifer, followed by monitoring the changes over time and space. In situ microcosms provide a more confined study site for measurements of microbial reactions, yet closer to natural conditions than laboratory microcosms. Two basic types of in situ aquifer microcosm have been described in recent years, and both originated from in situ instruments initially designed for geochemical measurements. Gillham et al. [Ground Water 28 (1990) 858-862] constructed an instrument that isolates a portion of an aquifer for in situ biochemical rate measurements. More recently Shati et al. [Environ. Sci. Technol. 30 (1996) 2646-2653] modified a multilayer sampler for studying the activity of inoculated bacteria in a contaminated aquifer Keeping in mind recent advances in environmental microbiology methodologies such as immunofluorescence direct counts, oligonucleotide and PCR probes, fatty acid methyl esther analysis for the detection and characterization of bacterial communities, measurement of mRNA and expression of proteins, it is evident that much new information can now be gained from in situ work. Using in situ microcosms to study bioremediation efficiencies, the fate of introduced microorganisms and general geobiochemical aquifer processes can shed more realistic light on the microbial underworld. The aim of this paper is to emphasize the importance of in situ studies and to describe two different concepts of construction and application of in situ microcosms for studying microbial activity in aquifers. The overall goal is to promote the development and utilization of these valuable and largely unexplored tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9299716     DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00332.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev        ISSN: 0168-6445            Impact factor:   16.408


  4 in total

1.  Dynamics of an oligotrophic bacterial aquifer community during contact with a groundwater plume contaminated with benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes: an in situ mesocosm study.

Authors:  Barbara Hendrickx; Winnie Dejonghe; Wesley Boënne; Maria Brennerova; Miroslav Cernik; Tomas Lederer; Margarete Bucheli-Witschel; Leen Bastiaens; Willy Verstraete; Eva M Top; Ludo Diels; Dirk Springael
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Microbial activity and community composition during bioremediation of diesel-oil-contaminated soil: effects of hydrocarbon concentration, fertilizers, and incubation time.

Authors:  Rosa Margesin; Marion Hämmerle; Dagmar Tscherko
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 3.  Cumene Contamination in Groundwater: Observed Concentrations, Evaluation of Remediation by Sulfate Enhanced Bioremediation (SEB), and Public Health Issues.

Authors:  John P Herman; Lauren Redfern; Christopher Teaf; Douglas Covert; Peter R Michael; Thomas M Missimer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Distribution of ETBE-degrading microorganisms and functional capability in groundwater, and implications for characterising aquifer ETBE biodegradation potential.

Authors:  Henry C G Nicholls; Stephen A Rolfe; Helen E H Mallinson; Markus Hjort; Michael J Spence; Matthijs Bonte; Steven F Thornton
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.