Literature DB >> 9299382

Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies.

S F Taylor1, S Kornblum, E J Lauber, S Minoshima, R A Koeppe.   

Abstract

The Stroop task, in which subjects must name the color of letters that spell color words different than the color-to-be-named, provides an important experimental paradigm for the study of selective attention. Cerebral blood flow activation studies have not always demonstrated consistent activation patterns; inconsistent results may reflect nonspecific responses, such as arousal or anticipation, rather than cerebral networks specific to Stroop interference processing. In order to identify regions consistently implicated in Stroop interference processing, we undertook two experiments with a Stroop interference paradigm and contrasting lexical and nonlexical control conditions. In our first experiment, standard Stroop stimuli, e.g., the word "RED" displayed in a green font, were contrasted with color naming of the font of noncolor words and color naming of a false font. In our second experiment, we compared Stroop stimuli with colored symbols and a control condition designed to elicit nonspecific interference-taboo words displayed in color fonts. Only two brain regions showed a consistent CBF change in both experiments. Activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus reflected processing more specific to the Stroop task, while deactivation in the right superior temporal gyrus occurred for the Stroop and the taboo conditions, consistent with more nonspecific processing. Activation in the anterior cingulate cortex occurred in only one comparison in one experiment and may not reflect functions central to overcoming Stroop interference. Copyright 1997 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9299382     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1997.0285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  51 in total

1.  Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task.

Authors:  V Menon; N E Adleman; C D White; G H Glover; A L Reiss
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Functionally independent components of the late positive event-related potential during visual spatial attention.

Authors:  S Makeig; M Westerfield; T P Jung; J Covington; J Townsend; T J Sejnowski; E Courchesne
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Wisconsin Card Sorting revisited: distinct neural circuits participating in different stages of the task identified by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  O Monchi; M Petrides; V Petre; K Worsley; A Dagher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Hemispheric asymmetry in human lateral prefrontal cortex during cognitive set shifting.

Authors:  Seiki Konishi; Toshihiro Hayashi; Idai Uchida; Hideyuki Kikyo; Emi Takahashi; Yasushi Miyashita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

Review 6.  The prefrontal cortex: insights from functional neuroimaging using cognitive activation tasks.

Authors:  Ingeborg Goethals; Kurt Audenaert; Christophe Van de Wiele; Rudi Dierckx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Behavioral conflict, anterior cingulate cortex, and experiment duration: implications of diverging data.

Authors:  Kirk I Erickson; Michael P Milham; Stanley J Colcombe; Arthur F Kramer; Marie T Banich; Andrew Webb; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Emotion triggers executive attention: anterior cingulate cortex and amygdala responses to emotional words in a conflict task.

Authors:  Philipp Kanske; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Adolescents at risk for alcohol abuse demonstrate altered frontal lobe activation during Stroop performance.

Authors:  Marisa M Silveri; Jadwiga Rogowska; Alexandra McCaffrey; Deborah A Yurgelun-Todd
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Genetic factors moderate everyday physical activity effects on executive functions in aging: Evidence from the Victoria Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Sherilyn Thibeau; G Peggy McFall; Sandra A Wiebe; Kaarin J Anstey; Roger A Dixon
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.