Literature DB >> 9298055

Evaluation of microbiological diagnostic techniques in postoperative endophthalmitis in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study.

M Barza1, P R Pavan, B H Doft, S R Wisniewski, L A Wilson, D P Han, S F Kelsey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the data for cultures and Gram stains prospectively collected by protocol in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study.
DESIGN: Cultures of aqueous, undiluted vitreous, and (for patients who underwent vitrectomy) vitrectomy cassette fluid obtained from 420 patients were prepared on chocolate agar, in thioglycolate broth, and on Sabouraud dextrose agar; Gram stains of the aqueous and undiluted vitreous were made. Criteria were devised to distinguish true pathogens (confirmed positive cultures) from contaminants.
SETTING: Private and university-based retina-vitreous practices and corresponding microbiology laboratories.
RESULTS: Compared with the aqueous, undiluted vitreous produced a higher percentage of confirmed positive cultures and higher colony counts on chocolate agar and was more frequently the only source of a positive culture from the eye. Nevertheless, the aqueous and vitrectomy cassette fluid were the only source of a positive culture from the eye in 4.2% and 8.9% of eyes, respectively. The overall yields of chocolate agar and thioglycolate broth were similar. A positive Gram stain from the aqueous or undiluted vitreous was highly predictive of a positive culture from the eye, but a negative Gram stain had little predictive value for the culture result. The overall rate of laboratory-confirmed infection was not statistically significantly higher in the vitrectomy group than in the tap or biopsy group.
CONCLUSIONS: The vitreous was a richer source of positive cultures and high colony counts than was the aqueous, either because it is more supportive of bacterial growth or because a somewhat larger inoculum of the vitreous than of aqueous could be obtained. The result of Gram stain should not determine the choice of antibiotic drugs in the treatment of endophthalmitis. Vitrectomy, with culture of the vitrectomy cassette fluid, did not produce significantly more positive cultures than tap or biopsy material, and the procedure should not be performed to improve the microbiological yield.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9298055     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100160312008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  30 in total

Review 1.  The microbiology of endophthalmitis: global trends and a local perspective.

Authors:  Y Keynan; Y Finkelman; P Lagacé-Wiens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Fungal and parasitic infections of the eye.

Authors:  S A Klotz; C C Penn; G J Negvesky; S I Butrus
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of uveitis.

Authors:  Chi-Chao Chan; DeFen Shen; Jingsheng Tuo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2005

Review 4.  [Molecular biology-based methods for pathogen detection in endophthalmitis].

Authors:  S Zimmermann; A Dalpke
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 5.  [Endogenous endophthalmitis].

Authors:  T Ness
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Laboratory diagnosis of infectious endophthalmitis.

Authors:  Wen-Jiang Ma; Hong Zhang; Shao-Zhen Zhao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis.

Authors:  K L Therese; A R Anand; H N Madhavan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  The additional value of blood culture bottles in the diagnosis of endophthalmitis.

Authors:  H S Tan; E A E Ghyczy-Carlborg; L Spanjaard; M D de Smet
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Post-intravitreal anti-VEGF endophthalmitis in the United Kingdom: incidence, features, risk factors, and outcomes.

Authors:  D A M Lyall; A Tey; B Foot; S T D Roxburgh; M Virdi; C Robertson; C J MacEwen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Polymerase chain reaction in intraocular inflammation.

Authors:  Krishnendu Nandi; Prabhat Ranjan; Lily Therese; Jyotirmay Biswas
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2008-10-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.