Literature DB >> 9297643

Bonding strengths of porcelain repair systems with various surface treatments.

K H Chung1, Y C Hwang.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Metal porcelain combined surfaces are often involved in the repairing of fractured porcelain fused to metal restoration.
PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of surface treatments on the bonding strength of porcelain fused to metal prosthesis repair.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Specimens (8 x 4 mm) were fabricated with Biobond II casting alloy and randomly divided into three surface groups: metal, porcelain, and metal-porcelain combined surface. Biobond porcelain system and commercially available porcelain repair systems were tested. The metal surface group was further divided into two subgroups: control and sandblasting treatment (Al2O3, 50 microns, 20 seconds). In the porcelain surface group, there were three subgroups: (1) control, (2) sandblasting, and (3) 9.5% hydrofluoric acid etching for 4 minutes. The metal-porcelain surface combined group was divided into three subgroups: (1) control, (2) sandblasting, and (3) sandblasting and etching. The manufacturer's instructions for repair systems were followed for specimen preparation. Shear bond strengths of 10 specimens for each subgroup were determined with a universal testing machine after storing in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 7 days. The data were analyzed with analysis of variance and Scheffé F-test at the 95% significance level.
RESULTS: The Liner-M repair system showed significantly greater strength than the other tested systems on the metal surface with or without sandblasting treatment (p < 0.05). On the porcelain surface, the strengths of sandblasting and etching subgroups ranged from 7.2 to 16.8 MPa, and 6.8 to 16.8 MPa, respectively. There were no significant differences in bond strengths between sandblasting and combined treatment of the metal-porcelain combined surface group (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that metal substrates treated with sandblasting and porcelain treated with either hydrofluoric acid or sandblasting can increase repair strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9297643     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70025-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  13 in total

1.  Influence of different power outputs of intraoral Nd:YAG laser on shear bond strength of a resin cement to nickel-chromium dental alloy.

Authors:  Azam sadat Madani; Pedram Ansari Astaneh; Sima Shahabi; Mohammad Reza Nakhaei; Hossein G Bagheri; Nasim Chiniforush
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  To evaluate the effect of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength of three different intraoral ceramic repair systems: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sidharth Jain; Hari Parkash; Sharad Gupta; Akshaya Bhargava
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-03-14

3.  The Effect of Mechanical and Chemical Surface Preparation Methods on the Bond Strength in Repairing the Surface of Metal-Ceramic Crowns with Composite Resin: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Farzaneh Shirani; Azadeh Kianipour; Mahdi Rahbar
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2020-06

4.  Effect of four different surface treatments on shear bond strength of three porcelain repair systems: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Ritesh Gourav; Padma Ariga; Ashish R Jain; Jacob Mathew Philip
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-05

5.  Intraoral repair of all ceramic fixed partial denture utilizing preimpregnated fiber reinforced composite.

Authors:  Süha Turkaslan; Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2008-01

6.  Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment.

Authors:  Ashish Kalra; Murali S Mohan; E Mahesh Gowda
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

7.  A comparative evaluation of bond strength of feldspathic porcelain to nickel-chromium alloy, when subjected to various surface treatments: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Kavan A Patel; Somil Mathur; Snehal Upadhyay
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

8.  Ceramic restoration repair: report of two cases.

Authors:  Luís Henrique Araújo Raposo; Natália Antunes Neiva; Gisele Rodrigues da Silva; Hugo Lemes Carlo; Adérito Soares da Mota; Célio Jesus do Prado; Carlos José Soares
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Addition of a pontic to all-ceramic Turkom-Cera fixed partial denture restorations.

Authors:  Bulent Uludag; Emre Tokar; Serdar Polat
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-04

10.  The effect of silane applied to glass ceramics on surface structure and bonding strength at different temperatures.

Authors:  Tevfik Yavuz; Oguz Eraslan
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.