Literature DB >> 929650

Factors influencing outcome and length of stay in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Part 1. Analysis of 248 unscreened patients--medical and functional prognostic indicators.

J S Feigenson, F H McDowell, P Meese, M L McCarthy, S D Greenberg.   

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of 248 patients with stroke (average age 67, range 17-98) admitted to a stroke rehabilitation unit over a sixteen month period showed that 80% of these patients were able to return home after an average length of stay (LOS) of 43 days. At discharge 85% of the group were ambulatory and 56% required no help in daily living activities. Severity of weakness on admission, long onset-admission intervals, the presence of severe perceptual or cognitive dysfunction or a homonymous hemianopsia in addition to a motor deficit were related to unfavorable outcome and increased LOS. The age of the patient, dysphasia or a hemisensory deficit in addition to weakness, or diabetes, hypertension, or ASHD were unrelated to the patients' functional status on discharge, discharge disposition, or LOS. Many patients with "unfavorable prognostic signs" made significant improvement after admission and were subsequently discharges. Thus, while the above findings may predict which patients can make maximal gains in a short term treatment facility, they also show that most patients, even those with "poor prognostic signs," can make enough functional improvement to be managed at home after a relatively short hospitalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 929650     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.8.6.651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  19 in total

1.  An investigation of factors affecting progress of patients on a stroke unit.

Authors:  N B Lincoln; M Blackburn; S Ellis; J Jackson; J A Edmans; F M Nouri; M F Walrer; H Haworth
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Who goes home? Predictive factors in stroke recovery.

Authors:  S Henley; S Pettit; A Todd-Pokropek; A Tupper
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Facilitatory effect of neglect rehabilitation on the recovery of left hemiplegic stroke patients: a cross-over study.

Authors:  S Paolucci; G Antonucci; C Guariglia; L Magnotti; L Pizzamiglio; P Zoccolotti
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Treating hypertension after stroke.

Authors:  J E O'Connell; C Gray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-11

5.  Lesion location associated with balance recovery and gait velocity change after rehabilitation in stroke patients.

Authors:  Hyun Im Moon; Hyo Jeong Lee; Seo Yeon Yoon
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Do visual field deficits exacerbate visuo-spatial neglect?

Authors:  P W Halligan; J C Marshall; D T Wade
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Characterization of hospitalized ischemic stroke patients in palestine.

Authors:  Af Sawalha
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 1.657

8.  The accuracy of predictions about progress of patients on a stroke unit.

Authors:  N B Lincoln; J M Jackson; J A Edmans; M F Walker; V M Farrow; A Latham; K Coombes
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Nursing home reimbursement and the allocation of rehabilitation therapy resources.

Authors:  C M Murtaugh; L M Cooney; R R DerSimonian; H L Smits; R B Fetter
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  Treatment of post-stroke hypertension. A practical guide.

Authors:  J E O'Connell; C S Gray
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.