Literature DB >> 9295193

Neuromagnetic fields reveal cortical plasticity when learning an auditory discrimination task.

S Cansino1, S J Williamson.   

Abstract

Auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields of the primary and association auditory cortices were recorded while subjects learned to discriminate small differences in frequency and intensity between two consecutive tones. When discrimination was no better than chance, evoked field patterns across the scalp manifested no significant differences between correct and incorrect responses. However, when performance was correct on at least 75% of the trials, the spatial pattern of magnetic field differed significantly between correct and incorrect responses during the first 70 ms following the onset of the second tone. In this respect, the magnetic field pattern predicted when the subject would make an incorrect judgment more than 100 ms prior to indicating the judgment by a button press. One subject improved discrimination for much smaller differences between stimuli after 200 h of training. Evidence of cortical plasticity with improved discrimination is provided by an accompanying decrease of the relative magnetic field amplitude of the 100 ms response components in the primary and association auditory cortices.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9295193     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00321-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  14 in total

Review 1.  Some neurobiological aspects of psychotherapy. A review.

Authors:  D Y Liggan; J Kay
Journal:  J Psychother Pract Res       Date:  1999

2.  A computational model of mechanisms controlling experience-dependent reorganization of representational maps in auditory cortex.

Authors:  E Mercado; C E Myers; M A Gluck
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The time course of neural changes underlying auditory perceptual learning.

Authors:  Mercedes Atienza; Jose L Cantero; Elena Dominguez-Marin
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Tonotopic cortical representation of periodic complex sounds.

Authors:  Selene Cansino; Antoine Ducorps; Richard Ragot
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Conditional associative memory for musical stimuli in nonmusicians: implications for absolute pitch.

Authors:  Patrick Bermudez; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Auditory cortical plasticity in learning to discriminate modulation rate.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Neuromagnetic evidence of broader auditory cortical tuning in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Donald C Rojas; Erin Slason; Peter D Teale; Martin L Reite
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 8.  Neuroimaging characteristics of patients with focal hand dystonia.

Authors:  Leighton B N Hinkley; Rebecca L Webster; Nancy N Byl; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 1.950

9.  Speech training alters consonant and vowel responses in multiple auditory cortex fields.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Kimiya C Rahebi; Elizabeth P Buell; Melyssa K Fink; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Image-to-sound conversion: experience-induced plasticity in auditory cortex of blindfolded adults.

Authors:  Bettina Pollok; Irmtraud Schnitzler; Petra Stoerig; Thomas Mierdorf; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.