Literature DB >> 9294989

Preejectional left ventricular wall motion in normal subjects using Doppler tissue imaging and correlation with ejection fraction.

D Pellerin1, L Cohen, F Larrazet, F Pajany, S Witchitz, C Veyrat.   

Abstract

Relations have been demonstrated between the preejection period (PEP) and indexes of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Doppler tissue M-mode imaging has the capability to measure wall velocities and to display as colored strips within the walls velocity reversals representing changes in direction of wall motion. To document LV preejectional wall motions, this procedure was performed on 16 normal subjects with a twofold purpose: to measure septal and posterior preejectional intramyocardial velocities and durations and to correlate preejectional parameters with LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Parasternal M-mode images of simultaneously recorded walls were digitized. Subendocardial wall velocities were measured every 3.8 ms from the Q wave to the onset of ejection. Total duration measured from Doppler tissue and flow traces was compared in 10 subjects. PEP total duration did not differ between both walls or techniques. Several adjacent velocity reversals with mirror signs in opposite walls were substantiated by 2 to 5 colored strips. Colored strips corresponding to the same sign in each wall had a progressively damped velocity amplitude (septum 19 +/- 8, -21 +/- 10, 15 +/- 7, -8 +/- 5, 4 +/- 2 mm/s; posterior wall -13 +/- 16, 11 +/- 7, -8 +/- 5, 9 +/- 6, -2 mm/s). Peak velocity values of opposite signs significantly differed between both walls (p <0.0001). Absolute values differed only for colored strips 2 and 3 (p <0.009). Strip 2 featured a simultaneous early inward motion of both walls toward the LV cavity with significantly prolonged duration (p <0.0001). The only positive correlation with LVEF was found for peak velocities of strip 2 in the posterior wall (r = 0.71, p <0.006). Thus, the posterior wall and its inward motion velocities have potential for future clinical implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9294989     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00429-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

Review 1.  Developments in cardiovascular ultrasound. Part 3: Cardiac applications.

Authors:  C M Moran; W N McDicken; P R Hoskins; P J Fish
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Tissue Doppler, strain, and strain rate echocardiography for the assessment of left and right systolic ventricular function.

Authors:  D Pellerin; R Sharma; P Elliott; C Veyrat
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Tissue Doppler imaging and the quantification of myocardial function.

Authors:  R Rambaldi; D Poldermans; W B Vletter; J J Bax; J R Roelandt
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1998-08

4.  Concordance between dobutamine Doppler tissue imaging echocardiography and rest reinjection thallium-201 tomography in dysfunctional hypoperfused myocardium.

Authors:  F Larrazet; D Pellerin; D Daou; S Witchitz; C Fournier; A Prigent; C Veyrat
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Early echocardiographic findings in β-thalassemia intermedia patients using standard and tissue Doppler methods.

Authors:  Hamid Amoozgar; Nahal Farhani; Mehran Karimi
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Transmural myocardial mechanics during isovolumic contraction.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ashikaga; Tycho I G van der Spoel; Benjamin A Coppola; Jeffrey H Omens
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-02

7.  Pulsed tissue Doppler imaging detects early myocardial dysfunction in asymptomatic patients with severe mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  E Agricola; M Galderisi; M Oppizzi; A F L Schinkel; F Maisano; M De Bonis; A Margonato; A Maseri; O Alfieri
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Strain and strain rate imaging: a promising tool for evaluation of ventricular function.

Authors:  L H B Baur
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 2.357

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.