Literature DB >> 9294750

Cervical radiculopathy: pain, muscle weakness and sensory loss in patients with cervical radiculopathy treated with surgery, physiotherapy or cervical collar. A prospective, controlled study.

L C Persson1, U Moritz, L Brandt, C A Carlsson.   

Abstract

This prospective, randomised study compares the efficacy of surgery, physiotherapy and cervical collar with respect to pain, motor weakness and sensory loss in 81 patients with long-lasting cervical radiculopathy corresponding to a nerve root that was significantly compressed by spondylotic encroachment, with or without an additional bulging disk, as verified by MRI or CT-myelography. Pain intensity was registered on a visual analogue scale (VAS), muscle strength was measured by a hand-held dynamometer, Vigorometer and pinchometer. Sensory loss and paraesthesia were recorded. The measurements were performed before treatment (control 1), 4 months after the start of treatment (control 2) and after a further 12 months (control 3). A healthy control group was used for comparison and to test the reliability of the muscle-strength measurements. The study found that before start of treatment the groups were uniform with respect to pain, motor weakness and sensory loss. At control 2 the surgery group reported less pain, less sensory loss and had better muscle strength, measured as the ratio of the affected side to the non-affected side, compared to the two conservative treatment groups. After a further year (control 3), there were no differences in pain intensity, sensory loss or paraesthesia between the groups. An improvement in muscle strengths, measured as the ratio of the affected to the non-affected side, was seen in the surgery group compared to the physiotherapy group in wrist extension, elbow extension, shoulder abduction and internal rotation, but there were no differences in the ratios between the collar group and the other treatment groups. With respect to absolute muscle strength of the affected sides, there were no differences at control 1. At control 2, the surgery group performed some-what better than the two other groups but at control 3 there were no differences between the groups. We conclude that pain intensity, muscle weakness and sensory loss can be expected to improve within a few months after surgery, while slow improvement with conservative treatments and recurrent symptoms in the surgery group make the 1-year results about equal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9294750      PMCID: PMC3454639          DOI: 10.1007/BF01322448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  51 in total

1.  The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks.

Authors:  R B CLOWARD
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1958-11       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Intradural connections between adjacent cervical spinal roots.

Authors:  J M Marzo; E H Simmons; F Kallen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Treatment of cervical disc disease using Cloward's technique. The prognostic value of clinical preoperative data in 1,106 patients.

Authors:  E F Eriksen; M Buhl; K Fode; A Klaerke; L Krøyer; H Lindeberg; C B Madsen; P Strange; L Wohlert; J O Espersen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Treatment of cervical disc disease using Cloward's technique. I. General results, effect of different operative methods and complications in 1,106 patients.

Authors:  J O Espersen; M Buhl; E F Eriksen; K Fode; A Klaerke; L Krøyer; H Lindeberg; C B Madsen; P Strange; L Wohlert
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  The effect of cervical mobility on the natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  M P Barnes; M Saunders
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 6.  Pathoanatomy and pathophysiology of nerve root compression.

Authors:  B Rydevik; M D Brown; G Lundborg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Normal grip strength.

Authors:  K G Thorngren; C O Werner
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1979-06

8.  Posterior-lateral foraminotomy as an exclusive operative technique for cervical radiculopathy: a review of 846 consecutively operated cases.

Authors:  C M Henderson; R G Hennessy; H M Shuey; E G Shackelford
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease. Part 1: Treatment of lateral cervical disc herniation in 253 cases.

Authors:  L D Lunsford; D J Bissonette; P J Jannetta; P E Sheptak; D S Zorub
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Shoulder motion and muscle strength of normal men and women in two age groups.

Authors:  M P Murray; D R Gore; G M Gardner; L A Mollinger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  30 in total

1.  Long-term randomised comparison between a carbon fibre cage and the Cloward procedure in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson; Ludek Vavruch; Rune Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Geographic variation in the surgical treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease: American Board of Orthopedic Surgery Quality Improvement Initiative; part II candidates.

Authors:  Kevin J McGuire; John Harrast; Harry Herkowitz; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  WITHDRAWN: Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Toon F M Boselie; Paul C Willems; Henk van Mameren; Rob de Bie; Edward C Benzel; Henk van Santbrink
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-21

Review 4.  Variation in the hypothenar muscles and its impact on ulnar tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Horst Claassen; Oliver Schmitt; Marko Schulze; Andreas Wree
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Investigation of clinically important benefit of anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Management of neck pain and associated disorders: A clinical practice guideline from the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration.

Authors:  Pierre Côté; Jessica J Wong; Deborah Sutton; Heather M Shearer; Silvano Mior; Kristi Randhawa; Arthur Ameis; Linda J Carroll; Margareta Nordin; Hainan Yu; Gail M Lindsay; Danielle Southerst; Sharanya Varatharajan; Craig Jacobs; Maja Stupar; Anne Taylor-Vaisey; Gabrielle van der Velde; Douglas P Gross; Robert J Brison; Mike Paulden; Carlo Ammendolia; J David Cassidy; Patrick Loisel; Shawn Marshall; Richard N Bohay; John Stapleton; Michel Lacerte; Murray Krahn; Roger Salhany
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  The orthotic treatment of acute and chronic disease of the cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Kourosh Zarghooni; Frank Beyer; Jan Siewe; Peer Eysel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Clinical outcomes of epidural neuroplasty for cervical disc herniation.

Authors:  Eun Jung Park; Sun Young Park; Se Jin Lee; Nan Seol Kim; Do Yle Koh
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 9.  Surgery for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy.

Authors:  Ioannis Nikolaidis; Ioannis P Fouyas; Peter Ag Sandercock; Patrick F Statham
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

10.  Cervical collar or physiotherapy versus wait and see policy for recent onset cervical radiculopathy: randomised trial.

Authors:  Barbara Kuijper; Jos Th J Tans; Anita Beelen; Frans Nollet; Marianne de Visser
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.