Literature DB >> 9294557

Overestimating the size of hepatic malignancy on helical CT during arterial portography: equilibrium phase CT and pathology.

M Kanematsu1, H Hoshi, T Yamada, Y Nandate, M Kato, R Yokoyama, T Murakami, H Nakamura.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Overestimating the size of hepatic malignancy with helical CT during arterial portography (CTAP) can be a potential pitfall in determining liver resection area. We evaluated the prevalence and extent of overestimation of hepatic malignancy on CTAP in correlation with helical equilibrium phase CT (EPCT) and pathologic findings.
METHOD: CTAP and EPCT in 47 histologically proven malignant hepatic tumors [33 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and 14 metastases] in 39 patients were retrospectively studied. Nineteen tumors were resected and pathologically evaluated.
RESULTS: The size overestimation ratios (CTAP/EPCT) ranged from 1.02 to 1.56 (mean +/- SD 1.24 +/- 0.16) in HCC and from 1.00 to 2.48 (1.34 +/- 0.42) in metastasis. In 19 surgical specimens, the overestimation ratios (CTAP/specimen) ranged from 1.05 to 1.45 (1.20 +/- 0.13) in HCC and from 1.10 to 1.38 (1.22 +/- 0.10) in metastasis. Histopathologically, flattening of parenchymal structures (100%), atrophy of hepatic cords (95%), sinusoidal congestions (95%), fibrosis and ductular proliferation (58%), and no tumor were seen in peritumoral parenchyma corresponding to perilesional perfusion defects with CTAP.
CONCLUSION: CTAP frequently and significantly overestimates the size of malignant hepatic tumors. This phenomenon is attributable to either benign histopathological changes in the perilesional liver parenchyma caused by parenchymal compression or portal venous obstruction by malignant liver tumors or to a siphoning effect by hypervascular neoplasms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9294557     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199709000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  5 in total

1.  Microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Emre Ünal; İlkay Sedakat İdilman; Deniz Akata; Mustafa Nasuh Özmen; Muşturay Karçaaltıncaba
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 2.  Hepatic perfusion disorders: etiopathogenesis and related diseases.

Authors:  Jin-Lin Tian; Jin-Shan Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Zeyu Zhang; Guorong Jia; Guixia Pan; Kai Cao; Qinqin Yang; Hongyu Meng; Jian Yang; Lu Zhang; Tao Wang; Chao Cheng; Changjing Zuo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Dynamic evolutionary changes in blood flow measured by MDCT in a hepatic VX2 tumor implant over an extended 28-day growth period: time-density curve analysis.

Authors:  Hanping Wu; Agata A Exner; Hong Shi; Joshua Bear; John R Haaga
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in planning thermal ablation of liver metastases: Should the hypervascular halo be included in the ablation volume?().

Authors:  A Andreano; E Meneghel; G Bovo; D Ippolito; A Salvioni; C Filice; S Sironi; M F Meloni
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2010-11-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.