Literature DB >> 9294364

A longitudinal study of skeletal side effects induced by rapid maxillary expansion.

J Y Chang1, J A McNamara, T A Herberger.   

Abstract

Orthopedic expansion of the maxillary arch--rapid maxillary expansion (RME)--is a commonly used treatment technique that has become increasingly popular during the last 25 years. During this time, however, clinicians routinely have imputed a variety of undesirable side effects to RME, particularly bite opening. Whereas there have been many explanations as to the mechanisms underlying such RME-related effects as bite opening, few studies have considered the long-term effects of RME in the vertical and sagittal dimensions of the face. The purpose of this investigation was to examine cephalometrically the long-term effect that the Haas-type rapid maxillary expansion may have on bite opening and on the anteroposterior position of the maxilla. The sample consisted of 25 patients who had undergone RME with the Haas-type expander, followed by standard edgewise therapy. This RME sample was compared with a group of 25 patients who had standard edgewise treatment (SET) only and with a control (CTRL) group of 23 subjects. Mean initial form and mean age at start of treatment for the RME, SET, and CTRL groups were similar. Statistically significant among-group differences were documented for only 2 of 10 cephalometric variables sensitive to anteroposterior and vertical skeletal changes. These differences, however, were not clinically significant. The current investigation implies therefore that RME therapy with the Haas-type expander has little long-term (more than 6 years after treatment) effect on either the vertical dimensions or the anteroposterior dimensions of the face.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9294364     DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70264-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Class III malocclusion and bilateral cross-bite in an adult patient treated with miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expander and aligners.

Authors:  Luca Lombardo; Antonella Carlucci; Bortolo Giuliano Maino; Anna Colonna; Emanuele Paoletto; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  An assessment of the maxilla after rapid maxillary expansion using cone beam computed tomography in growing children.

Authors:  Jessica L Woller; Ki Beom Kim; Rolf G Behrents; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

Review 3.  Does rapid maxillary expansion induce adverse effects in growing subjects?

Authors:  Roberta Lione; Lorenzo Franchi; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Changes in occlusal relationships in mixed dentition patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion. A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  James A McNamara; Lauren M Sigler; Lorenzo Franchi; Susan S Guest; Tiziano Baccetti
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Evaluation of the rapid and slow maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Juliana da S Pereira; Helder B Jacob; Arno Locks; Mauricio Brunetto; Gerson L U Ribeiro
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

Review 6.  Changes in the Mandible Following Rapid Maxillary Expansion in Children with Class II Malocclusion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Małgorzata Kotarska; Nazan Kucukkeles; Joanna Lis; Beata Kawala; Kornelia Rumin; Michał Sarul
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-11

7.  Differences in dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes due to rapid maxillary expansion using a tooth-borne expander between adolescents and adults: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jung-Sub An; Bo-Yeon Seo; Sug-Joon Ahn
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 1.372

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.