Literature DB >> 9292563

Factors influencing dialysis patients' completion of advance directives.

J L Holley1, L Stackiewicz, C Dacko, R Rault.   

Abstract

Although chronic dialysis patients support the use of advance directives, they rarely complete them. We asked 80 chronic dialysis patients (60 receiving in-center hemodialysis and 20 receiving peritoneal dialysis) why they had not completed an advance directive, and gave them the opportunity to complete a dialysis-specific living will and to designate a health care proxy. Questionnaires containing the dialysis-specific living will, patient demographic information, and questions about advance directives were distributed during a routine hemodialysis session or peritoneal dialysis clinic visit by a nurse working in the unit. Forty-one hemodialysis patients and 14 peritoneal dialysis patients completed the questionnaires (69% response rate). The mean age was 53 +/- 15 years and the mean time on dialysis was 5 +/- 5 years. Fifty-eight percent of the patients were women, 57% were white, 67% were hospitalized in the past year, 23% were employed, 70% had children, and 21% lived alone (43% lived with a partner and 11% lived with parents). All patients thought advance directives were a good idea, but only 35% had completed one and only seven (14%) had discussed wishes for life-sustaining therapy with their nephrologist; 34 patients (67%) had discussed their wishes with their family. Most said they had not completed an advance directive because their family knew what they would want (12 of 32 patients [38%]). Thirty-nine patients who completed the questionnaire also completed the dialysis-specific living will (71%). Those who did not complete the dialysis-specific living will chose not to because they were not sure what they would want done (12 of 16 patients [75%]). The only demographic factor that influenced completion of the dialysis-specific living will was having children: more patients with children did not complete the will (12 of 37 patients [32%] with children v two of 16 patients [13%] without children; P = 0.02). The dialysis-specific living will asks about choices for life-sustaining treatment (cardiopulmonary resuscitation and dialysis) based on one's health state (current health; permanent coma; terminal illness; mild, moderate, or severe stroke; dementia). Using patient-specific advance directives that focus on health states rather than life-sustaining interventions (eg, the dialysis-specific living will) and repeated discussion of advance directives and advance care planning initiated by dialysis unit staff may improve the completion of advance directives by chronic dialysis patients. The appropriate focus of such issues should include family involvement and health states rather than treatment interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9292563     DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90279-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  15 in total

Review 1.  Designing and evaluating interventions to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in health care.

Authors:  Lisa A Cooper; Martha N Hill; Neil R Powe
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Should there be an expanded role for palliative care in end-stage renal disease?

Authors:  Manjula Kurella Tamura; Lewis M Cohen
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Awareness of Racial Disparities in Kidney Transplantation among Health Care Providers in Dialysis Facilities.

Authors:  Joyce J Kim; Mohua Basu; Laura Plantinga; Stephen O Pastan; Sumit Mohan; Kayla Smith; Taylor Melanson; Cam Escoffery; Rachel E Patzer
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Is the End in Sight for the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Approach to Advance Care Planning?

Authors:  Rachel C Carson; Rachelle Bernacki
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Prevalence and Contents of Advance Directives of Patients with ESRD Receiving Dialysis.

Authors:  Molly A Feely; Daniel Hildebrandt; Jithinraj Edakkanambeth Varayil; Paul S Mueller
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Preferences for dialysis withdrawal and engagement in advance care planning within a diverse sample of dialysis patients.

Authors:  Manjula Kurella Tamura; Mary K Goldstein; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 5.992

7.  Advance Directives and End-of-Life Care among Nursing Home Residents Receiving Maintenance Dialysis.

Authors:  Manjula Kurella Tamura; Maria E Montez-Rath; Yoshio N Hall; Ronit Katz; Ann M O'Hare
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 8.  Advance care planning in elderly chronic dialysis patients.

Authors:  Jean L Holley
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Rationale and Design of the Randomized Evaluation of Default Access to Palliative Services (REDAPS) Trial.

Authors:  Katherine R Courtright; Vanessa Madden; Nicole B Gabler; Elizabeth Cooney; Dylan S Small; Andrea Troxel; David Casarett; Mary Ersek; J Brian Cassel; Lauren Hersch Nicholas; Gabriel Escobar; Sarah H Hill; Dan O'Brien; Mark Vogel; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-09

10.  Nephrologist-Facilitated Advance Care Planning for Hemodialysis Patients: A Quality Improvement Project.

Authors:  Osama W Amro; Malar Ramasamy; James A Strom; Daniel E Weiner; Bertrand L Jaber
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 8.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.