Literature DB >> 9291856

Auranofin is safe and superior to placebo in elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis.

A Glennås1, T K Kvien, O Andrup, O Clarke-Jenssen, B Karstensen, U Brodin.   

Abstract

The efficacy, toxicity and possible steroid-sparing properties of auranofin in the treatment of elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) were studied in a 2 yr prospective double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Sixty-five patients with onset of arthritis after the age of 60 yr were randomized to either auranofin 3 mg b.i.d. [n = 31, age 70 (61-84) yr, median (range)] or placebo tablets [n = 34, age 72 (60-81) yr]. Oral prednisolone, starting dose 7.5 or 20 mg daily, was used as a rescue drug in patients with intolerable joint pain and stiffness and with C-reactive protein (CRP) > or = 20 mg/l, and was tapered down according to protocol guidelines. Patients receiving auranofin continued therapy for a longer period of time (55% completers) than those on placebo medication (18% completers). The auranofin group consumed significantly less prednisolone, 2.64 (0-11.85) mg/day [median (range)], compared to 5.0 (0-18.33) mg/day in the placebo group (P = 0.006). No group differences at 2 yr follow-up were found for changes in joint pain (P = 0.49), number of swollen joints (P = 0.61), Health Assessment Questionnaire score (P = 0.18) and radiographic damage score (Larsen-Dale index) of the hands (P = 0.84). Within-group changes in radiographic scores were also insignificant. The drop-out rate due to adverse events was surprisingly higher in the placebo group (41%) than in the auranofin group (10%) and, as expected, higher due to lack of effect (29 and 16%). The results indicate that auranofin is safe, superior to placebo and has steroid-sparing capacity in the treatment of EORA. The favourable radiographic outcome in both groups needs confirmation in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9291856     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/36.8.870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0263-7103


  16 in total

1.  Aggressive treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised controlled trial. On behalf of the Rheumatic Research Foundation Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Authors:  C H van Jaarsveld; J W Jacobs; M J van der Veen; A A Blaauw; A A Kruize; D M Hofman; H L Brus; G A van Albada-Kuipers; A H Heurkens; E J ter Borg; H C Haanen; C van Booma-Frankfort; Y Schenk; J W Bijlsma
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  The biological activity of auranofin: implications for novel treatment of diseases.

Authors:  J M Madeira; D L Gibson; W F Kean; A Klegeris
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 3.  Criteria for TNF-targeted therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: estimates of the number of patients potentially eligible.

Authors:  T K Kvien; T Uhlig; I S Kristiansen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) improve pain in inflammatory arthritis (IA): a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Amanda J Steiman; Janet E Pope; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Lihua Li; Cheryl Barnabe; Fares Kalache; Tabitha Kung; Louis Bessette; Cathy Flanagan; Boulos Haraoui; Jacqueline Hochman; Sharon Leclercq; Dianne Mosher; Carter Thorne; Vivian Bykerk
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 5.  Management issues with elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis: an update.

Authors:  Ignazio Olivieri; Carlo Palazzi; Giovanni Peruz; Angela Padula
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Guidelines for the use of conventional and newer disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Alejandro Díaz-Borjón
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Novel action and mechanism of auranofin in inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3-dependent lymphangiogenesis.

Authors:  Xiaodong Chen; Huanjiao Jenny Zhou; Qunhua Huang; Lin Lu; Wang Min
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 8.  A conceptually new treatment approach for relapsed glioblastoma: coordinated undermining of survival paths with nine repurposed drugs (CUSP9) by the International Initiative for Accelerated Improvement of Glioblastoma Care.

Authors:  Richard E Kast; John A Boockvar; Ansgar Brüning; Francesco Cappello; Wen-Wei Chang; Boris Cvek; Q Ping Dou; Alfonso Duenas-Gonzalez; Thomas Efferth; Daniele Focosi; Seyed H Ghaffari; Georg Karpel-Massler; Kirsi Ketola; Alireza Khoshnevisan; Daniel Keizman; Nicolas Magné; Christine Marosi; Kerrie McDonald; Miguel Muñoz; Ameya Paranjpe; Mohammad H Pourgholami; Iacopo Sardi; Avishay Sella; Kalkunte S Srivenugopal; Marco Tuccori; Weiguang Wang; Christian R Wirtz; Marc-Eric Halatsch
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2013-04

9.  Anti-rheumatic agent auranofin induced apoptosis in chronic myeloid leukemia cells resistant to imatinib through both Bcr/Abl-dependent and -independent mechanisms.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Xianping Shi; Chong Zhao; Xiaofen Li; Xiaoying Lan; Shouting Liu; Hongbiao Huang; Ningning Liu; Siyan Liao; Dan Zang; Wenbin Song; Quentin Liu; Bing Z Carter; Q Ping Dou; Xuejun Wang; Jinbao Liu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-10-15

10.  Auranofin-mediated inhibition of PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis and anticancer activity in non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Hongyu Li; Jing Hu; Shuhong Wu; Li Wang; Xiaobo Cao; Xiaoshan Zhang; Bingbing Dai; Mengru Cao; Ruping Shao; Ran Zhang; Mourad Majidi; Lin Ji; John V Heymach; Michael Wang; Shiyang Pan; John Minna; Reza J Mehran; Stephen G Swisher; Jack A Roth; Bingliang Fang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-01-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.