R A Barkley1, J Biederman. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachustts Medical Center, Worcester 01655, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To critique the age-of-onset criterion (AOC) for the diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: The specific AOC of 7 years for symptoms producing impairment as part of the diagnostic criteria is examined from historical, empirical, conceptual, and pragmatic perspectives. RESULTS: No support could be found for the continued use of this criterion for either clinical or research diagnostic purposes. While both empirical and conceptual grounds exist for viewing ADHD as a disorder that typically has its onset of symptoms during childhood, no support exists for the selection of age 7 years for onset of a valid disorder, either for symptom onset or for onset of impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Several reasons favor dispensing with a precise AOC, either for symptom onset or onset of impairment, not the least of which is that it is scientifically indefensible, poses unwarranted practical problems for the study of older adolescents and adults, and may be arbitrarily discriminatory. Until such time as an empirical justification can be marshaled for a precise AOC for ADHD, the current AOC should be either abandoned or generously broadened to include onset of symptoms during the entire childhood years, in keeping with its conceptualization as a childhood-onset disorder.
OBJECTIVE: To critique the age-of-onset criterion (AOC) for the diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: The specific AOC of 7 years for symptoms producing impairment as part of the diagnostic criteria is examined from historical, empirical, conceptual, and pragmatic perspectives. RESULTS: No support could be found for the continued use of this criterion for either clinical or research diagnostic purposes. While both empirical and conceptual grounds exist for viewing ADHD as a disorder that typically has its onset of symptoms during childhood, no support exists for the selection of age 7 years for onset of a valid disorder, either for symptom onset or for onset of impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Several reasons favor dispensing with a precise AOC, either for symptom onset or onset of impairment, not the least of which is that it is scientifically indefensible, poses unwarranted practical problems for the study of older adolescents and adults, and may be arbitrarily discriminatory. Until such time as an empirical justification can be marshaled for a precise AOC for ADHD, the current AOC should be either abandoned or generously broadened to include onset of symptoms during the entire childhood years, in keeping with its conceptualization as a childhood-onset disorder.
Authors: Eve M Valera; Rebecca M C Spencer; Thomas A Zeffiro; Nikos Makris; Thomas J Spencer; Stephen V Faraone; Joseph Biederman; Larry J Seidman Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2010-08-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Eugenio H Grevet; Claiton H D Bau; Carlos A I Salgado; Aline G Fischer; Katiane Kalil; Marcelo M Victor; Christiane R Garcia; Nyvia O Sousa; Luis A Rohde; Paulo Belmonte-de-Abreu Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2006-05-12 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Sandra J J Kooij; Susanne Bejerot; Andrew Blackwell; Herve Caci; Miquel Casas-Brugué; Pieter J Carpentier; Dan Edvinsson; John Fayyad; Karin Foeken; Michael Fitzgerald; Veronique Gaillac; Ylva Ginsberg; Chantal Henry; Johanna Krause; Michael B Lensing; Iris Manor; Helmut Niederhofer; Carlos Nunes-Filipe; Martin D Ohlmeier; Pierre Oswald; Stefano Pallanti; Artemios Pehlivanidis; Josep A Ramos-Quiroga; Maria Rastam; Doris Ryffel-Rawak; Steven Stes; Philip Asherson Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2010-09-03 Impact factor: 3.630