Literature DB >> 9290710

Evaluation of prognostic factors following expansive laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy.

K Kohno1, Y Kumon, Y Oka, S Matsui, S Ohue, S Sakaki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Expansive laminoplasty of several types has been proposed for patients with cervical multisegmental stenotic myelopathy to reduce postlaminectomy complications. Its effectiveness has not been fully explored by evaluating long-term results and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings before and after surgery.
METHODS: We conducted a 5-year follow-up study of 22 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and/or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament surgically treated with expansive laminoplasty. The operative results were examined using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) disability scale, with reference to the findings of MRI, computed tomography, and radiography.
RESULTS: Postoperative improvement was observed in 18 (81.8%) of the 22 patients. In 11 patients the percentage recovery of the JOA score was higher than 50% (average: 83.1%), while in the remaining 11 patients it was lower than 50% (average: 20.1%). Factors contributing to incomplete recovery appear to be related mainly to cord degeneration with atrophy (depicted as a T2-high intensity area) and to specific factors such as long symptom duration, age higher than 70 years, deterioration due to trauma, severe cord compression, radiculopathy, and kyphotic cervical curvature.
CONCLUSIONS: In cervical myelopathy, patients with multisegmental stenosis, expansive laminoplasty can be expected to provide a favorable outcome by providing sufficient cord decompression and stabilization of the cervical spine, when the stenotic cervical canal is enlarged to the normal range (over 12 mm residual anteroposterior diameter and 200 mm2 residual canal area). The efficacy can be restricted by various factors, especially irreparable cord degeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9290710     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(97)00166-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol        ISSN: 0090-3019


  31 in total

1.  Prediction of lower limb functional recovery after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: focusing on the 10-s step test.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nakashima; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Masaaki Machino; Shunsuke Kanbara; Daigo Morita; Hiroshi Takahashi; Shiro Imagama; Zenya Ito; Naoki Ishiguro; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical laminoplasty construct stability: an experimental and finite element investigation.

Authors:  Srinivas C Tadepalli; Anup A Gandhi; Douglas C Fredericks; Nicole M Grosland; Joseph Smucker
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2011

Review 3.  Cervical laminectomy and instrumented lateral mass fusion: techniques, pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Michael Mayer; Oliver Meier; Alexander Auffarth; Heiko Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Factors associated with postoperative C5 palsy after expansive open-door laminoplasty: retrospective cohort study using multivariable analysis.

Authors:  Takashi Tsuji; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Ken Ishii; Nobuyuki Fujita; Kazuhiro Chiba; Kota Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Open Door Laminoplasty: Creation Of A New Vertebral Arch.

Authors:  Monica Lara-Almunia; Javier Hernandez-Vicente
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-02-09

6.  Evaluation of corticospinal excitability in cervical myelopathy, before and after surgery, with transcranial magnetic stimulation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Alessia Nicotra; Nicolas K K King; Maria Catley; Nigel Mendoza; Alison H McGregor; Paul H Strutton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Diffusion tensor imaging can predict surgical outcomes of patients with cervical compression myelopathy.

Authors:  Satoshi Maki; Masao Koda; Mitsuhiro Kitamura; Taigo Inada; Koshiro Kamiya; Mitsutoshi Ota; Yasushi Iijima; Junya Saito; Yoshitada Masuda; Koji Matsumoto; Masatoshi Kojima; Takayuki Obata; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Takeo Furuya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Double-door cervical laminoplasty with suture anchors: evaluation of the clinical performance of the constructs.

Authors:  Takashi Fujishiro; Atsushi Nakano; Ichiro Baba; Shingo Fukumoto; Yoshiharu Nakaya; Masashi Neo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  [Cervical myelopathy as a complication of rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  A C Arlt; J Steinmetz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Prognostic factors that affect the surgical outcome of the laminoplasty in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Jae-Sung Ahn; June-Kyu Lee; Bo-Kun Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.