Literature DB >> 9288840

A randomised multicentre trial of CHART versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

S Dische1, M Saunders, A Barrett, A Harvey, D Gibson, M Parmar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) has shown promise of improved tumour control and reduced late morbidity in pilot studies and has now been tested in a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with squamous cell cancer in the main sites within the head and neck region with the general exception of early T1 N0 tumours were entered into the study by 11 centres. There was a 3:2 randomisation to either CHART, where a dose of 54 Gy was given in 36 fractions over 12 days, or to conventional therapy where 66 Gy was given in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks. A total of 918 patients were included over a 5 year period from March 1990.
RESULTS: ACUTE MORBIDITY: Acute radiation mucositis was more severe with CHART, occurred earlier but settled sooner and was in nearly all cases healed by 8 weeks in both arms. Skin reactions were less severe and settled more quickly in the CHART treated patients. TUMOUR CONTROL AND SURVIVAL: Life table analyses of loco-regional control, primary tumour control, nodal control, disease-free interval, freedom from metastasis and survival showed no evidence of differences between the two arms. In exploratory subgroup analyses there was evidence of a greater response to CHART in younger patients (P = 0.041) and poorly differentiated tumours appeared to fare better with conventional radiotherapy (P = 0.030). In the larynx there was evidence of a trend towards increasing benefit with more advanced T stage (P = 0.002). LATE TREATMENT RELATED MORBIDITY: Osteoradionecrosis occurred in 0.4% of patients after CHART and 1.4% of patients after conventional radiotherapy. The incidence of chondritis or cartilage necrosis was similar in both arms. Life table analysis showed evidence of reduced severity in a number of late morbidities in favour of CHART. These were most striking for skin telangiectasia, superficial and deep ulceration of the mucosa and laryngeal oedema.
CONCLUSION: Similar local turnout control was achieved by CHART as compared with conventional radiotherapy despite the reduction in total dose from 66 to 54 Gy supporting the importance of repopulation as a cause of radiation failure. The effects seen in advanced laryngeal cancer and those related to histological differentiation need further study. Reduced late morbidity is a factor which together with patient preference should be considered in the decision as to the programme of radiotherapy to employ in the curative treatment of head and neck cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9288840     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(97)00094-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  43 in total

Review 1.  Altered fractionation in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  K S Hu; L B Harrison
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Monte Carlo radiotherapy simulations of accelerated repopulation and reoxygenation for hypoxic head and neck cancer.

Authors:  W M Harriss-Phillips; E Bezak; E K Yeoh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant integrated boost of 70-75 Gy in 5 weeks for advanced head and neck cancer. A phase I dose escalation study.

Authors:  J Cvek; J Kubes; E Skacelikova; B Otahal; P Kominek; M Halamka; D Feltl
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Acute mucosal radiation reactions in patients with head and neck cancer. Patterns of mucosal healing on the basis of daily examinations.

Authors:  A Wygoda; K Składowski; T Rutkowski; M Hutnik; M Goleń; B Pilecki; W Przeorek; B Lukaszczyk-Wideł
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  [Management of the unscheduled interruption or prolongation of a radical course of radiotherapy].

Authors:  M Baumann; T Herrmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  [Reasons for the terms "radiosurgery" and "Gamma Knife"].

Authors:  K Hamm; G Surber
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Hypofractionated accelerated radiotherapy in T1-3 N0 cancer of the larynx: A prospective cohort study with historical controls.

Authors:  Zbigniew Szutkowski; Andrzej Kawecki; Andrzej Jarząbski; Zofia Laskus; Romuald Krajewski; Wojciech Michalski; Paweł Kukołowicz
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-09-20

8.  Quantitative Ultrasonic Nakagami Imaging of Neck Fibrosis After Head and Neck Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Yang; Emi Yoshida; Richard J Cassidy; Jonathan J Beitler; David S Yu; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Clinical radiobiology of head and neck cancer: the hypothesis of stem cell activation.

Authors:  P Pedicini; R Caivano; A Fiorentino; L Strigari
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Recombinant human epidermal growth factor treatment of radiation-induced severe oral mucositis in patients with head and neck malignancies.

Authors:  J P Hong; S-W Lee; S Y Song; S D Ahn; S S Shin; E K Choi; J H Kim
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 2.520

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.