Literature DB >> 9287446

Coping, life attitudes, and immune responses to imagery and group support after breast cancer treatment.

M A Richardson1, J Post-White, E A Grimm, L A Moye, S E Singletary, B Justice.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pilot study used clinical trial methodology to differentiate the effects of imagery and support on coping, life attitudes, immune function, quality of life, and emotional well-being after breast cancer.
METHODS: Women (N = 47) who completed treatment for primary breast cancer, excluding stage IV, were randomly assigned to standard care (n = 15) or six weekly support (n = 16) or imagery (n = 16) sessions. Self-report measures included Ways of Coping-Cancer, Life Attitude Profile, Quality of Life (FACT-B), Profile of Mood States, and Functional Support. Immune measures included natural killer cell activity, plasma neopterin, interferon-gamma, interleukins 1 alpha, 1 beta, and 2, and beta-endorphin levels. Differences between groups over time were tested using general linear models, adjusted for pretest score and covariates (age, stage, and months posttreatment).
RESULTS: For all women, interferon-gamma increased, neopterin decreased, quality of life improved, and natural killer activity remained unchanged. Compared with standard care, both interventions improved coping skills (seeking support) and perceived social support, and tended to enhance meaning in life. Support boosted overall coping and death acceptance. When comparing imagery with support, imagery participants tended to have less stress, increased vigor, and improved functional and social quality of life.
CONCLUSION: Although imagery reduced stress and improved quality of life, both imagery and support improved coping, attitudes, and perception of support. The clinical implications of these changes warrant further testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9287446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Altern Ther Health Med        ISSN: 1078-6791            Impact factor:   1.305


  16 in total

Review 1.  Biobehavioral outcomes following psychological interventions for cancer patients.

Authors:  Barbara L Andersen
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-06

Review 2.  Nuevo Amanecer: results of a randomized controlled trial of a community-based, peer-delivered stress management intervention to improve quality of life in Latinas with breast cancer.

Authors:  Anna María Nápoles; Carmen Ortíz; Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson; Anita L Stewart; Steven Gregorich; Howard E Lee; Ysabel Durón; Peggy McGuire; Judith Luce
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Clinical practice guidelines on the use of integrative therapies as supportive care in patients treated for breast cancer.

Authors:  Heather Greenlee; Lynda G Balneaves; Linda E Carlson; Misha Cohen; Gary Deng; Dawn Hershman; Matthew Mumber; Jane Perlmutter; Dugald Seely; Ananda Sen; Suzanna M Zick; Debu Tripathy
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2014-11

Review 4.  Effectiveness of Stress-Reducing Interventions on the Response to Challenges to the Immune System: A Meta-Analytic Review.

Authors:  Lemmy Schakel; Dieuwke S Veldhuijzen; Paige I Crompvoets; Jos A Bosch; Sheldon Cohen; Henriët van Middendorp; Simone A Joosten; Tom H M Ottenhoff; Leo G Visser; Andrea W M Evers
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 17.659

5.  Biobehavioral approaches to cancer progression and survival: Mechanisms and interventions.

Authors:  Susan K Lutgendorf; Barbara L Andersen
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2015 Feb-Mar

6.  Fatigue, sleep, pain, mood, and performance status in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ann Coleman; Julia A Goodwin; Sharon K Coon; Kathy Richards; Carol Enderlin; Robert Kennedy; Carol B Stewart; Paula McNatt; Kim Lockhart; Elias J Anaissie; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 7.  Clinical practice guidelines on the evidence-based use of integrative therapies during and after breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Heather Greenlee; Melissa J DuPont-Reyes; Lynda G Balneaves; Linda E Carlson; Misha R Cohen; Gary Deng; Jillian A Johnson; Matthew Mumber; Dugald Seely; Suzanna M Zick; Lindsay M Boyce; Debu Tripathy
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Mind-Body Medicine and Immune System Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Helané Wahbeh; Ashley Haywood; Karen Kaufman; Heather Zwickey
Journal:  Open Complement Med J       Date:  2009

9.  Psychological, behavioral, and immune changes after a psychological intervention: a clinical trial.

Authors:  Barbara L Andersen; William B Farrar; Deanna M Golden-Kreutz; Ronald Glaser; Charles F Emery; Timothy R Crespin; Charles L Shapiro; William E Carson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Immune response, depression and fatigue in relation to support intervention in mammary cancer patients.

Authors:  Christina Lindemalm; Fariba Mozaffari; Aniruddha Choudhury; Helena Granstam-Björneklett; Mats Lekander; Bo Nilsson; Marja-Leena Ojutkangas; Anders Osterborg; Leif Bergkvist; Håkan Mellstedt
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.