Literature DB >> 9286853

Safety of mibefradil, a new once-a-day, selective T-type calcium channel antagonist.

I Kobrin1, V Charlon, E Lindberg, R Pordy.   

Abstract

The safety and tolerability of mibefradil, a selective T-type calcium channel antagonist, were evaluated in 3,430 patients with essential hypertension and chronic stable angina pectoris treated in 15 double-blind placebo and active-controlled clinical trials and 2 open-label, long-term safety studies. Of these patients, 2,636 were treated with the recommended doses of mibefradil (50 and 100 mg) and form the basis of this report. With the 50-mg dose of mibefradil, the incidence of each adverse event was similar to, or lower than, that observed in the placebo-treated patients. Treatment with the 100-mg dose was associated with a slightly higher incidence compared to placebo of dizziness (2.1% vs 1.8%), leg edema (3.5% vs 1.4%), fatigue (2.1% vs 1.4%), and lightheadedness (2.1% vs 0.4%). The incidence of headache (4.6%) and angina pectoris (1.1%) was more frequent in patients treated with placebo. In active-controlled trials, a lower incidence of pedal edema (5.1%) was observed with mibefradil compared to amlodipine (25.7%), diltiazem SR/CD (9.4%), or nifedipine SR/GITS (17.4%). Overall, mibefradil was better tolerated than amlodipine and nifedipine SR/GITS and was as well tolerated as diltiazem SR/CD. Rates of premature discontinuation due to clinically adverse experiences with the 50- and 100-mg doses were 2.5% and 3.5%, respectively, compared with placebo (3.5%). No consistent pattern of laboratory adverse experiences were observed for mibefradil. Sinus bradycardia (heart rate <45 beats/minute) and first-degree atrioventricular block were the only relevant treatment-emergent electrocardiographic changes that occurred more frequently with mibefradil than with placebo. No evidence of first-dose effects was observed in mibefradil-treated patients, and withdrawal effects were not observed in clinical trials. There were no clinically important differences in safety profiles in the demographic subgroups for age, gender, or race. The results of this comprehensive safety analysis indicate that treatment with the recommended doses of mibefradil is well tolerated and safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9286853     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00569-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Timed sequential therapy of the selective T-type calcium channel blocker mibefradil and temozolomide in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Matthias Holdhoff; Xiaobu Ye; Jeffrey G Supko; Louis B Nabors; Arati S Desai; Tobias Walbert; Glenn J Lesser; William L Read; Frank S Lieberman; Martin A Lodge; Jeffrey Leal; Joy D Fisher; Serena Desideri; Stuart A Grossman; Richard L Wahl; David Schiff
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Mibefradil. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in the management of hypertension and angina pectoris.

Authors:  R N Brogden; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Predicting the clinical relevance of drug interactions from pre-approval studies.

Authors:  Silvio Caccia; Silvio Garattini; Luca Pasina; Alessandro Nobili
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Mibefradil, a novel therapy for glioblastoma multiforme: cell cycle synchronization and interlaced therapy in a murine model.

Authors:  Stephen T Keir; Henry S Friedman; David A Reardon; Darell D Bigner; Lloyd A Gray
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Targeting T-type/CaV3.2 channels for chronic pain.

Authors:  Song Cai; Kimberly Gomez; Aubin Moutal; Rajesh Khanna
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 10.171

Review 6.  Targeting Ca2 + Handling Proteins for the Treatment of Heart Failure and Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Alexandra Njegic; Claire Wilson; Elizabeth J Cartwright
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.