Literature DB >> 9286749

Single-colony derived strains of human marrow stromal fibroblasts form bone after transplantation in vivo.

S A Kuznetsov1, P H Krebsbach, K Satomura, J Kerr, M Riminucci, D Benayahu, P G Robey.   

Abstract

Populations of marrow stromal fibroblasts (MSFs) can differentiate into functional osteoblasts and form bone in vivo. It is not known, however, what proportion of MSF precursor cells, colony forming units-fibroblast (CFU-Fs), have osteogenic potential. In the present study, analysis of bone formation in vivo by single-colony derived strains of human marrow stromal fibroblasts (HMSFs) has been performed for the first time. Each strain originated from an individual CFU-F and underwent four passages in vitro prior to subcutaneous implantation into immunodeficient mice within vehicles containing hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate ceramic. Multicolony derived HMSF strains were also transplanted to serve as positive controls. After 8 weeks, abundant bone formation was found in the transplants of all multicolony derived HMSF strains, whereas 20 out of 34 (58.8%) single-colony derived strains from four donors formed bone. Immunostaining with antibody directed against human osteonectin and in situ hybridization for human-specific alu sequences demonstrated that cells forming new bone were of human origin and were vital for at least 45 weeks post-transplantation. Both the incidence of bone-forming colonies and the extent of bone formation by single-colony derived HMSF strains were increased by cultivation with dexamethasone and ascorbic acid phosphate. Other factors, including type of transplantation vehicle, morphology, size, and structure of the original HMSF colonies showed no obvious correlation with the incidence or extent of bone formation. Hematopoietic tissue within the newly formed bone was developed in the transplants exhibiting exuberant bone formation. These results provide evidence that individual human CFU-Fs have osteogenic potential and yet differ from each other with respect to their osteogenic capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9286749     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.9.1335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  172 in total

1.  Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  S Gronthos; M Mankani; J Brahim; P G Robey; S Shi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Identification of a subpopulation of rapidly self-renewing and multipotential adult stem cells in colonies of human marrow stromal cells.

Authors:  D C Colter; I Sekiya; D J Prockop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Mesenchymal stem cells for the sustained in vivo delivery of bioactive factors.

Authors:  Todd Meyerrose; Scott Olson; Suzanne Pontow; Stefanos Kalomoiris; Yunjoon Jung; Geralyn Annett; Gerhard Bauer; Jan A Nolta
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Comparison of long-term retinoic acid-based neural induction methods of bone marrow human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Busra Mammadov; Nihal Karakas; Sevim Isik
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.416

5.  Changes of the Functional Capacity of Mesenchymal Stem Cells due to Aging or Age-Associated Disease - Implications for Clinical Applications and Donor Recruitment.

Authors:  Günter Lepperdinger; Regina Brunauer; Robert Gassner; Angelika Jamnig; Frank Kloss; Gerhard Thomas Laschober
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 6.  One strategy for cell and gene therapy: harnessing the power of adult stem cells to repair tissues.

Authors:  Darwin J Prockop; Carl A Gregory; Jeffery L Spees
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A cultured living bone equivalent enhances bone formation when compared to a cell seeding approach.

Authors:  S C Mendes; M Sleijster; A Van Den Muysenberg; J D De Bruijn; C A Van Blitterswijk
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 8.  Building strong bones: molecular regulation of the osteoblast lineage.

Authors:  Fanxin Long
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 9.  Adipose tissue stem cells meet preadipocyte commitment: going back to the future.

Authors:  William P Cawthorn; Erica L Scheller; Ormond A MacDougald
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 5.922

Review 10.  Tissue engineered bone grafts: biological requirements, tissue culture and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Mirjam Fröhlich; Warren L Grayson; Leo Q Wan; Darja Marolt; Matej Drobnic; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.828

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.