Literature DB >> 9285774

Characterization of susceptible chiasma configurations that increase the risk for maternal nondisjunction of chromosome 21.

N E Lamb1, E Feingold, A Savage, D Avramopoulos, S Freeman, Y Gu, A Hallberg, J Hersey, G Karadima, D Pettay, D Saker, J Shen, L Taft, M Mikkelsen, M B Petersen, T Hassold, S L Sherman.   

Abstract

Recent studies of trisomy 21 have shown that altered levels of recombination are associated with maternal non-disjunction occurring at both meiosis I (MI) and meiosis II (MII). To comprehend better the association of recombination with nondisjunction, an understanding of the pattern of meiotic exchange, i.e. the exchange of genetic material at the four-strand stage during prophase, is required. We examined this underlying exchange pattern to determine if specific meiotic configurations are associated with a higher risk of non-disjunction than others. We examined the crossover frequencies of chromosome 21 for three populations: (i) normal female meiotic events; (ii) meiotic events leading to MI non-disjunction; and (iii) those leading to MII non-disjunction. From these crossover frequencies, we estimated the array of meiotic tetrads that produced the observed crossovers. Using this approach, we found that nearly one-half of MI errors were estimated to be achiasmate. The majority of the remaining MI bivalents had exchanges that clustered at the telomere. In contrast, exchanges occurring among MII cases clustered at the pericentromeric region of the chromosome. Unlike the single exchange distributions, double exchanges from the non-disjoined populations seemed to approximate the distribution in the normal population. These data suggest that the location of certain exchanges makes a tetrad susceptible to non-disjunction. Specifically, this susceptibility is associated with the distance between the centromere and closest exchange. This result challenges the widely held concept that events occurring at MII are largely independent of events occurring at MI, and suggests that all non-disjunction events may be initiated during MI and simply resolved at either of the two meiotic stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9285774     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/6.9.1391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  50 in total

1.  A high-resolution physical map of human chromosome 21p using yeast artificial chromosomes.

Authors:  S Y Wang; M Cruts; J Del-Favero; Y Zhang; F Tissir; M C Potier; D Patterson; D Nizetic; A Bosch; H Chen; L Bennett; X Estivill; A Kessling; S E Antonarakis; C van Broeckhoven
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Trisomic pregnancy and earlier age at menopause.

Authors:  J Kline; A Kinney; B Levin; D Warburton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-06-28       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Altered patterns of multiple recombinant events are associated with nondisjunction of chromosome 21.

Authors:  Tiffany Renee Oliver; Stuart W Tinker; Emily Graves Allen; Natasha Hollis; Adam E Locke; Lora J H Bean; Reshmi Chowdhury; Ferdouse Begum; Mary Marazita; Vivian Cheung; Eleanor Feingold; Stephanie L Sherman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Obligate short-arm exchange in de novo Robertsonian translocation formation influences placement of crossovers in chromosome 21 nondisjunction.

Authors:  Sue Ann Berend; Scott L Page; William Atkinson; Christopher McCaskill; Neil E Lamb; Stephanie L Sherman; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-12-23       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Meiotic origins of maternal age-related aneuploidy.

Authors:  Teresa Chiang; Richard M Schultz; Michael A Lampson
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Heterochromatin-mediated association of achiasmate homologs declines with age when cohesion is compromised.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi V Subramanian; Sharon E Bickel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Parental-age effects in Down syndrome.

Authors:  Santhosh Girirajan
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  Meiotic exchange and segregation in female mice heterozygous for paracentric inversions.

Authors:  Kara E Koehler; Elise A Millie; Jonathan P Cherry; Stefanie E Schrump; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Meiotic recombination at the ends of chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Arnold B Barton; Michael R Pekosz; Rohini S Kurvathi; David B Kaback
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Investigation of factors associated with paternal nondisjunction of chromosome 21.

Authors:  Tiffany Renee Oliver; Archit Bhise; Eleanor Feingold; Stuart Tinker; Nirupama Masse; Stephanie L Sherman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.