PURPOSE: To define the appearance of peripheral vascular malformations at magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and assess the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRA in the investigation of these lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients (aged 8-51 years) with clinical evidence of a vascular malformation were referred for MRI and MRA, performed on a 0.5T GE Vectra superconducting system (International General Electric, Slough, UK). Multisection T1-weighted spin-echo and T2-weighted fast spin-echo pulse sequences were performed, with an inversion recovery fast spin-echo sequence in two cases. Two-dimensional time of flight (2-D TOF) and/or 2-D phase contrast (PC) MRA was performed in 13 cases. Eleven patients had digital subtraction angiography (DSA) using a Phillips Integris V3000 digital angiographic unit. The findings at MRA and MRI were compared with the catheter angiograms, and the effective diagnostic input of MRA and MRI was determined. RESULTS: MRA demonstrated major feeding vessels and multiple intra-lesional vessels in relation to the high flow lesions, features absent in the low flow lesions. However, small feeding vessels to the AVMs were not clearly identified. MRI gave a clear demonstration of the anatomical extent of all lesions. AVMs (n = 6) and venous malformations (n = 6) were reliably distinguished, the former containing multiple serpentine signal voids on T1- and T2-weighted imaging, the latter being hyperintense to fat on T2-weighted images. Two other high-flow lesions diagnosed clinically as vascular malformations appeared solid on MRI, and were diagnosed histologically as a carotid body tumour and an angiomyolipoma. CONCLUSION: Although 2-D TOF MRA can distinguish AVMs from venous malformations, the technique adds little extra practical information to the diagnostic process, and cannot compete with catheter angiography for the detailed demonstration of AVM feeding vessels. These lesions can also be characterized using spin-echo sequences, though the primary role of MRI is to demonstrate their anatomical extent.
PURPOSE: To define the appearance of peripheral vascular malformations at magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and assess the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRA in the investigation of these lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients (aged 8-51 years) with clinical evidence of a vascular malformation were referred for MRI and MRA, performed on a 0.5T GE Vectra superconducting system (International General Electric, Slough, UK). Multisection T1-weighted spin-echo and T2-weighted fast spin-echo pulse sequences were performed, with an inversion recovery fast spin-echo sequence in two cases. Two-dimensional time of flight (2-D TOF) and/or 2-D phase contrast (PC) MRA was performed in 13 cases. Eleven patients had digital subtraction angiography (DSA) using a Phillips Integris V3000 digital angiographic unit. The findings at MRA and MRI were compared with the catheter angiograms, and the effective diagnostic input of MRA and MRI was determined. RESULTS: MRA demonstrated major feeding vessels and multiple intra-lesional vessels in relation to the high flow lesions, features absent in the low flow lesions. However, small feeding vessels to the AVMs were not clearly identified. MRI gave a clear demonstration of the anatomical extent of all lesions. AVMs (n = 6) and venous malformations (n = 6) were reliably distinguished, the former containing multiple serpentine signal voids on T1- and T2-weighted imaging, the latter being hyperintense to fat on T2-weighted images. Two other high-flow lesions diagnosed clinically as vascular malformations appeared solid on MRI, and were diagnosed histologically as a carotid body tumour and an angiomyolipoma. CONCLUSION: Although 2-D TOF MRA can distinguish AVMs from venous malformations, the technique adds little extra practical information to the diagnostic process, and cannot compete with catheter angiography for the detailed demonstration of AVM feeding vessels. These lesions can also be characterized using spin-echo sequences, though the primary role of MRI is to demonstrate their anatomical extent.
Authors: Laura J Merrill; Christina A Gurnett; Marilyn Siegel; Sushil Sonavane; Matthew B Dobbs Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Laura M Fayad; Tuncay Hazirolan; John A Carrino; David A Bluemke; Sally Mitchell Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2008-06-25 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Shrey K Thawait; Kate Puttgen; John A Carrino; Laura M Fayad; Sally E Mitchell; Thierry A G M Huisman; Aylin Tekes Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 3.183