Literature DB >> 9285301

Ureteroscopic management of lower ureteral stones: two years' experience.

C Y Bilen1, K Mahalati, A Sahin, I Tekin, H Ozen, D Remzi.   

Abstract

A total of 140 ureteroscopies in 119 patients done between January 1992 and December 1994 at the Department of Urology, Hacettepe University Hospital, were reviewed. Factors such as previous ESWL therapy, previous surgery and use of in situ lithotripsy were noted. Success was defined as complete removal or disintegration and partial removal of the lower ureteral stones. All successes were confirmed by plain abdominal X-rays postoperatively. Of 140 stone manipulations attempted in 119 patients 106 (75.7%) were successful (in 80 by retrieval and in 26 by disintegration using electrohydraulic or laser). Perforation occurred in 4 of 13 cases where electrohydraulic lithotripsy was used for disintegration of stones. Extraction by ureteroscopic manipulation following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was successful in all of the 12 cases of lower ureteral calculi. The success rate was found to be low for lower ureteral stones in patients with previous open surgery (2/9). A total of 43.2% of the patients were medically indicated to be hospitalized following the procedure with a mean hospitalization time of 5 days (ranging in between 1 to 7 days). Ureteroscopy is an effective method for management of lower ureteral stones. Use of the electrohydraulic lithotriptor may be associated with a high percentage of complications. Previous ESWL may be associated with a high rate of success. Results in patients with previous open surgery are not encouraging. Although all patients can be subjected to the procedure on an outpatient basis, a significant percentage need a short hospitalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9285301     DOI: 10.1007/bf02550926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  18 in total

1.  Long-term experience with transurethral rigid ureteroscopy as a complementary method to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  K Kressel; H Hoffmann; M Butz
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Electrohydraulic ureterolithotripsy. Preliminary report.

Authors:  A M Raney
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Flexible ultrasonic lithotriptor and fiberoptic ureterorenoscope: a new approach to ureteral calculi.

Authors:  E Higashihara; Y Aso
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  An aggressive approach to stones in the lower ureter.

Authors:  A Walsh
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1974-02

5.  Forceful endoscopic extraction of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  H Lamensdorf; D E Compere; G F Begley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Optimal therapy for the distal ureteral stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy.

Authors:  K R Anderson; D W Keetch; D M Albala; P S Chandhoke; B L McClennan; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Prediction of septicemia following endourological manipulation for stones in the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  P N Rao; D A Dube; N C Weightman; B A Oppenheim; J Morris
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Treatment of distal ureteral calculi with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Experience with 264 cases.

Authors:  C Zehntner; G A Casanova; D Marth; E J Zingg
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Clinical experience with a new pulsed dye laser for ureteral stone lithotripsy.

Authors:  M Zerbib; T Flam; M Belas; B Debre; A Steg
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Complications of ureteroscopy.

Authors:  T A Flam; M J Malone; R A Roth
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.241

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparision of intracorporeal lithotripsy methods and forceps use for distal ureteral stones: seven years experience.

Authors:  C O Yeniyol; A R Ayder; S Minareci; S Ciçek; T Süelözgen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.370

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.