Literature DB >> 9284855

Increased toxicity of high-dose furosemide versus low-dose dopamine in the treatment of refractory congestive heart failure.

G Cotter1, J Weissgarten, E Metzkor, Y Moshkovitz, I Litinski, U Tavori, C Perry, R Zaidenstein, A Golik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose dopamine, high-dose furosemide, and their combination in the treatment of refractory congestive heart failure.
METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with refractory congestive heart failure were randomized to receive intravenous low-dose (4 micrograms/kg/min) dopamine combined with low-dose (80 mg/day) oral furosemide (group A; n = 7), intravenous low-dose dopamine with medium-dose furosemide (5 mg/kg/day through continuous intravenous administration; group B; n = 7), or high-dose furosemide (10 mg/kg/day through continuous intravenous administration; group C; n = 6).
RESULTS: The three groups showed similar improvement in signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure, urinary output (2506 +/- 671 ml/24 hr, mean +/- SD) and weight loss (3.3 +/- 2.3 kg) after 72 hours of therapy. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) decreased by 14% +/- 8% and 15% +/- 6% in groups B and C, respectively, but increased by 4% +/- 15% in group A (p = 0.017). Renal function deteriorated significantly in groups B and C: creatinine clearance decreased by 41% +/- 23% and 42% +/- 23%, respectively, but increased by 14% +/- 35% in group A (p = 0.0074). MAP decrease was positively correlated with the decrease in creatinine clearance (r = 0.7; p = 0.0007). Patients in group B and C had more hypokalemia than group A. Two patients in group C sustained acute oliguric renal failure and one patient in group B died suddenly while sustaining severe hypokalemia.
CONCLUSION: Combined low-dose intravenous dopamine and oral furosemide have similar efficacy but induce less renal impairment and hypokalemia than higher doses of intravenous furosemide taken either alone or with low-dose dopamine. The renal impairment induced by intravenous furosemide is probably related to its hypotensive effect in patients with refractory congestive heart failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9284855     DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9236(97)90067-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  25 in total

Review 1.  Benefit-risk assessment of nesiritide in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Treatment of congestion in heart failure with diuretics and extracorporeal therapies: effects on symptoms, renal function, and prognosis.

Authors:  Maria Rosa Costanzo; Mariell Jessup
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  A prospective, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy of various diuretic strategies in acute decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  Ruchit A Shah; Vijayakumar Subban; Anitha Lakshmanan; Srinivasan Narayanan; Kalaichelvan Udhayakumaran; Balaji Pakshirajan; Jaishankar Krishnamoorthy; Kalidass Latchumanadhas; Ezhilan Janakiraman; Ajit S Mullasari
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2014-04-18

4.  Relation between dose of loop diuretics and outcomes in a heart failure population: results of the ESCAPE trial.

Authors:  Vic Hasselblad; Wendy Gattis Stough; Monica R Shah; Yuliya Lokhnygina; Christopher M O'Connor; Robert M Califf; Kirkwood F Adams
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 15.534

5.  Targeting the kidney in acute heart failure: can old drugs provide new benefit? Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (ROSE AHF) trial.

Authors:  Horng H Chen; Omar F AbouEzzeddine; Kevin J Anstrom; Michael M Givertz; Bradley A Bart; G Michael Felker; Adrian F Hernandez; Kerry L Lee; Eugene Braunwald; Margaret M Redfield
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 8.790

6.  The use of mannitol in partial and live donor nephrectomy: an international survey.

Authors:  M Cosentino; A Breda; F Sanguedolce; J Landman; J-U Stolzenburg; P Verze; J Rassweiler; H Van Poppel; H C Klingler; G Janetschek; A Celia; F J Kim; G Thalmann; U Nagele; A Mogorovich; C Bolenz; T Knoll; F Porpiglia; M Alvarez-Maestro; F Francesca; F Deho; S Eggener; C Abbou; M V Meng; M Aron; P Laguna; D Mladenov; A D'Addessi; P Bove; R Schiavina; O De Cobelli; A S Merseburger; O Dalpiaz; F C H D'Ancona; T J Polascik; R Muschter; T J Leppert; H Villavicencio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  The role of ultrafiltration in patients with decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  Sandeep A Kamath
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-19

Review 8.  ROSE-AHF and lessons learned.

Authors:  Amit K Jain; Horng H Chen
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-09

Review 9.  Prevention of acute kidney injury and protection of renal function in the intensive care unit. Expert opinion of the Working Group for Nephrology, ESICM.

Authors:  Michael Joannidis; Wilfred Druml; Lui G Forni; A B Johan Groeneveld; Patrick Honore; Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten; Claudio Ronco; Marie R C Schetz; Arend Jan Woittiez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Practice patterns and outcomes in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute heart failure.

Authors:  Crystal A Richter; Jeanrian Claude M Kalenga; Brian H Rowe; Lauren C Bresee; Ross T Tsuyuki
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.