Literature DB >> 9283852

Qualitative research interviewing by general practitioners. A personal view of the opportunities and pitfalls.

P Hoddinott1, R Pill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study looked look at the role of the GP as a qualitative research interviewer and aimed to illustrate areas of methodological difficulty using personal observations made during a qualitative study in general practice. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The recently published literature on qualitative research in general practice was reviewed by the author to inform her own qualitative study looking at how women decide how to feed their babies. Some women in the study were patients of the author; some knew that she is a GP but were registered at another practice and some did not know that she is a doctor. In-depth and semi-structured interviews were tape recorded and transcribed. Observations about combining general practice and qualitative research were recorded by the author in a research diary.
CONCLUSION: Qualitative research is being advocated as a methodology appropriate for general practice, yet there are many unanswered questions about methodological detail. There are no guidelines to help GPs to decide whether it is appropriate for them to do the interviewing, the practicalities of doing it, and whether they should use their own patients. There is clearly a need for more methodological research to look at how these decisions influence the data and to inform GPs who are considering a qualitative study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9283852     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/14.4.307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  13 in total

1.  Management of deliberate self harm in general practice: a qualitative study.

Authors:  L R Prasad; M M Gantley; M R Underwood
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations.

Authors:  Deborah J Cohen; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Barriers to referral in patients with angina: qualitative study.

Authors:  K Gardner; A Chapple
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-14

4.  A qualitative study of women's views about how health professionals communicate about infant feeding.

Authors:  Pat Hoddinott; Roisin Pill
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Impact of erectile dysfunction and its subsequent treatment with sildenafil: qualitative study.

Authors:  John Tomlinson; David Wright
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-29

6.  Qualitative study of decisions about infant feeding among women in east end of London.

Authors:  P Hoddinott; R Pill
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-02

7.  A qualitative study of the acceptability of routine screening of postnatal women using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

Authors:  Judy Shakespeare; Fiona Blake; Jo Garcia
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Qualitative study of patients' perceptions of doctors' advice to quit smoking: implications for opportunistic health promotion.

Authors:  C C Butler; R Pill; N C Stott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-20

9.  Using reflexivity to enhance in-depth interviewing skills for the clinician researcher.

Authors:  Ruth McNair; Angela Taft; Kelsey Hegarty
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-11-09       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Understanding reasons for non-adherence to active surveillance for low-intermediate risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kerri Beckmann; Declan Cahill; Christian Brown; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Netty Kinsella
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.