Literature DB >> 9283277

Defining and measuring unintended pregnancy: issues and concerns.

R Petersen1, M K Moos.   

Abstract

This article of the past and current measures of unintendedness of pregnancy has been offered in the hope that investigation into this area can be expanded. Current information available from available national surveys is not comparable due to different survey questions, inclusion criteria, and timing of interviews. What are often reported as rates of unintendedness may be rates of unwantedness--a completely different concept. Many studies fail to delineate the distinction between those unintended pregnancies that are indeed unintended versus those that were mistimed. Potentially, these existing data sets could be reanalyzed by using specific inclusion criteria for unintendedness, maternal age, and marital status. This information might be helpful in improving the comparability between the surveys and in assessing trends in unintendedness. In the future, to accurately measure unintendedness of pregnancy, we must use a consistent definition that takes into account the complexities of the issue. Valid and reliable scales that reflect the value of unintendedness from the mother's perspective need to be developed to reflect the potential change in intendedness over time. The adequate measurement of unintendedness of pregnancy is the first step in addressing the Healthy People 2000 goal and measuring progress in addressing the nation's reportedly high rate in the long-term goal of addressing the risk factors of unintended pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9283277     DOI: 10.1016/S1049-3867(97)00009-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  28 in total

1.  Defining dimensions of pregnancy intendedness.

Authors:  J B Stanford; R Hobbs; P Jameson; M J DeWitt; R C Fischer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-09

2.  Changes in intendedness during pregnancy in a high-risk multiparous population.

Authors:  V L Poole; J S Flowers; R L Goldenberg; S P Cliver; S McNeal
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-09

3.  Parental attitudes about a pregnancy predict birth weight in a low-income population.

Authors:  Robert D Keeley; Alison Birchard; Perry Dickinson; John Steiner; L Miriam Dickinson; Susan Rymer; Blake Palmer; Torri Derback; Allison Kempe
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  The estimation of unwanted fertility.

Authors:  John B Casterline; Laila O El-Zeini
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2007-11

Review 5.  The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities.

Authors:  David C Reardon
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-10-29

6.  Prospective assessment of pregnancy intentions using a single- versus a multi-item measure.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2009-12

7.  Pregnancy intentions-a complex construct and call for new measures.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Katherine J Sapra; Rosalind B King; Jean Fredo Louis; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Development and psychometric testing of the attitude toward potential pregnancy scale.

Authors:  Mary T Paterno; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2014-10-14

9.  Unintended pregnancy in a commercially insured population.

Authors:  Diane C Green; Julie A Gazmararian; Lisa D Mahoney; Nancy A Davis
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2002-09

10.  Conceptualisation, development, and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy.

Authors:  G Barrett; S C Smith; K Wellings
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.