Literature DB >> 9283263

Cancer screening and prevention in rural Wisconsin: the Greater Marshfield Experience.

D J Reding1, K A Lappe, M Krueger, B L Kolehouse, D Steneil, R A Leer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Providing medical services to rural residents results in unique challenges to providers and patients. Cancer screening (CS) and early detection services (EDS) are frequently underutilized with rural residents often presenting with advanced cancer at diagnosis. A comprehensive approach to determine barriers and overcome them constitutes "The Greater Marshfield Experience."
METHODS: Focus groups with rural residents determined the greatest barriers to receipt of CS and EDS were distance, cost, time from work and self-reliant behavior. Directives to address these concerns were to keep information simple and provide services at the workplace. In response, Marshfield Clinic and its research division developed a collaborative research partnership with public health agencies (PHA), federally funded government programs and volunteer agencies.
RESULTS: In-house activities to remove barriers for providing CS and EDS included the development of a separate screening unit for these activities. Reminder systems were employed to notify patients of the need and availability of preventative services. Co-payments for health screening services were eliminated from the clinic owned health plan. Area residents near poverty level were encouraged to enroll in federally subsidized health plans that promoted and paid for CS and EDS. Federally funded cancer screening studies were implemented that funded breast and cervical cancer screening and evaluated the benefits of screening for prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancers (PLCO). Outreach activities included developing partnerships with local PHA and minority groups and providing mobile screening services to remote areas.
CONCLUSION: Concentrated, collaborative efforts to develop in-house systems and outreach activities resulted in delivery of CS and EDS in remote areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9283263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wis Med J        ISSN: 0043-6542


  5 in total

1.  The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Resa M Jones; Steven H Woolf; Tina D Cunningham; Robert E Johnson; Alex H Krist; Stephen F Rothemich; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Resa M Jones; Kelly J Devers; Anton J Kuzel; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 3.  Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Outcomes: Opportunities for Future Research.

Authors:  Smita Bhatia; Wendy Landier; Electra D Paskett; Katherine B Peters; Janette K Merrill; Jonathan Phillips; Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 11.816

4.  Mammography-based screening program: preliminary results from a first 2-year round in a Brazilian region using mobile and fixed units.

Authors:  Raphael Luiz Haikel; Edmundo Carvalho Mauad; Thiago Buosi Silva; Jacó Saraiva de Castro Mattos; Luciano Fernandes Chala; Adhemar Longatto-Filho; Nestor de Barros
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Engaging health systems to increase colorectal cancer screening: community-clinical outreach in underserved areas of Wisconsin.

Authors:  Noelle K LoConte; Lauren Weeth-Feinstein; Amy Conlon; Sheryl Scott
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.830

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.