Literature DB >> 9283077

Comparison of DNA bending by Fos-Jun and phased A tracts by multifactorial phasing analysis.

T K Kerppola1.   

Abstract

Studies of DNA bending by Fos and Jun using different methods have yielded contradictory results. Whereas gel electrophoretic phasing analysis indicates that Fos and Jun bend DNA, results obtained through X-ray crystallography and ligase-catalyzed cyclization suggest that they do not. To test the assumptions underlying phasing analysis and to examine DNA bending by Fos and Jun, a multifactorial phasing analysis approach based on the distinct electrophoretic mobilities of DNA fragments of diverse shapes was developed. In this approach, the spacing between the bends, the length of sequences flanking the bends, and the acrylamide concentration in the gel are varied. Two closely spaced intrinsic bends with long flanking sequences had the same effect on electrophoretic mobility as a single bend corresponding to the sum of the bends when they were arranged in phase, and the difference between the bends when they were arranged out of phase. Based on the phase-dependent electrophoretic mobility variation of fragments containing intrinsic DNA bends of different magnitudes, three criteria for determination whether the phase-dependent mobility variation of protein-DNA complexes is caused by DNA bending were adopted. Complexes formed by the bZIP domains of Fos and Jun fulfilled each of these criteria. First, the electrophoretic mobility variation induced by Fos and Jun was proportional to that caused by an intrinsic bend over a broad range of acrylamide concentrations. Second, the mobility difference between fragments containing in phase and out of phase bends was reduced by an increase in the separation between the bends. The separation between the bends had the same effect on the electrophoretic mobility variation caused by Fos and Jun as well as intrinsic bends on long DNA fragments at low acrylamide concentrations. Third, on short DNA fragments analyzed at high acrylamide concentrations, two intrinsic bends separated by long spacers caused a larger decrease in electrophoretic mobility when they were out of phase than when they were in phase. This reversal of the phase dependence of the electrophoretic mobility variation was also observed for complexes formed by truncated Fos and Jun. Thus, the phase-dependent mobility variation of Fos and Jun complexes is due to DNA bending.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9283077     DOI: 10.1021/bi971119w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  5 in total

1.  Transcriptional activation by LR1 at the Emu enhancer and switch region sites.

Authors:  L A Hanakahi; N Maizels
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Asymmetric recognition of nonconsensus AP-1 sites by Fos-Jun and Jun-Jun influences transcriptional cooperativity with NFAT1.

Authors:  Vladimir Ramirez-Carrozzi; Tom Kerppola
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Design and calibration of a semi-synthetic DNA phasing assay.

Authors:  P R Hardwidge; J M Zimmerman; L J Maher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Experimental evaluation of the Liu-Beveridge dinucleotide step model of DNA structure.

Authors:  P R Hardwidge; L J Maher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Molecular basis of cooperative DNA bending and oriented heterodimer binding in the NFAT1-Fos-Jun-ARRE2 complex.

Authors:  R J Diebold; N Rajaram; D A Leonard; T K Kerppola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.