Literature DB >> 9282973

Evaluation of the lactulose/mannitol and 51Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid/14C-mannitol methods for intestinal permeability.

L Blomquist1, T Bark, G Hedenborg, A Norman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We earlier compared the lactulose/mannitol and 51Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)/14C-mannitol methods for intestinal permeability We have now investigated an increased number of control subjects, with special regard to the influence of urinary volume, sex, age, and smoking on marker excretion, and patients with intestinal disorders, with special regard to correlations between markers.
METHODS: The 0- to 6-h urinary excretion of orally administered markers was measured in 65 control subjects and in 70 patients.
RESULTS: In the control group excretion of mannitol and 14C-mannitol (small-pore permeability markers) was strongly correlated to urinary volume, whereas such correlation was weak for lactulose and absent for 51Cr-EDTA (large-pore permeability markers). No sex difference in marker excretion was found, but correlation to urinary volume was more pronounced in males. There was a slightly decreasing excretion of markers with increasing age, reaching significance for 51Cr-EDTA and 14C-mannitol; their excretion ratio was unaffected. Smoking did not significantly affect marker excretion. In the patient group the excretion of large-pore markers tended to be higher and that of small-pore markers to be lower than in the control group; correlation between the large-pore markers, between the small-pore markers, and between the large-pore/small-pore marker ratios was higher than in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Correction for urinary volume substantially reduces variability in small-pore marker excretion. Excretion of both types of markers tends to decrease with age, the large-pore/small-pore marker ratio remaining unchanged. Smoking does not affect small-intestinal permeability. 14C-mannitol is preferred to chemically determined mannitol owing to lower test variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9282973     DOI: 10.3109/00365529708996538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  3 in total

1.  Intestinal permeability in patients after surgical trauma and effect of enteral nutrition versus parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Jiang; Ning Li; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Intestinal barrier dysfunction in irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nikita Hanning; Adam L Edwinson; Hannah Ceuleers; Stephanie A Peters; Joris G De Man; Leslie C Hassett; Benedicte Y De Winter; Madhusudan Grover
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.409

3.  A case for improved assessment of gut permeability: a meta-analysis quantifying the lactulose:mannitol ratio in coeliac and Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Hutan Ashrafian; Alex J Thompson; Jonathan Gan; Scarlet Nazarian; Julian Teare; Ara Darzi
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.067

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.