Literature DB >> 9282186

Delayed diagnosis of femoral neck fractures.

G Pathak1, M J Parker, G A Pryor.   

Abstract

To determine the causes and consequences of any delay from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis, 1108 consecutive patients with an acute proximal femoral fracture were prospectively studied. In 154 cases (13.9 per cent) the diagnosis was delayed more than 24 h from the onset of symptoms. The reason for this was due to failure to seek medical help in 63 patients. For the 91 patients who were seen by a medical practioner, 60 were not X-rayed straight away. For those cases where a radiographic examination was requested, the fracture was invisible in only nine cases, of which six subsequently displaced. The diagnosis was more likely to be delayed if the fracture occurred spontaneously, the patient fell inside, or the fracture was intracapsular. Delay in diagnosis was not associated with an increase in mortality but there was a significant increase in the risk of pressure sores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9282186     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(96)00198-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  12 in total

Review 1.  A painful hip.

Authors:  Philip J O'Connor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-09-15

Review 2.  New advances in imaging osteoporosis and its complications.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Added value of interpreter experience in occult and suspect hip fractures: a retrospective analysis of 254 patients.

Authors:  David Collin; Jan H Göthlin; Martin Nilsson; Mikael Hellström; Mats Geijer
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-02-25

4.  Prevalence of exclusively and concomitant pelvic fractures at magnetic resonance imaging of suspect and occult hip fractures.

Authors:  David Collin; Mats Geijer; Jan H Göthlin
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-10-02

5.  Who is more accurate in the diagnosis of neck of femur fractures, radiologists or orthopaedic trainees?

Authors:  R W Jordan; E Dickenson; N Baraza; K Srinivasan
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Accuracy of a modified axiolateral radiographic hip projection in suspected cases of hip fracture: experience and results from a regional trauma centre.

Authors:  Wan Chin Lee; Felicia Yanyan Luo; Katherine Kai Qian Tiong; Nicholas Wai Kit Chia; Lisa Mui Hiong Tham; Tien Jin Tan
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-08-24

7.  Computed tomography compared to magnetic resonance imaging in occult or suspect hip fractures. A retrospective study in 44 patients.

Authors:  David Collin; Mats Geijer; Jan H Göthlin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Digital image enhancement improves diagnosis of nondisplaced proximal femur fractures.

Authors:  Itamar Busheri Botser; Amir Herman; Ram Nathaniel; Dan Rappaport; Aharon Chechik
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The Bristol hip view: its role in the diagnosis and surgical planning and occult fracture diagnosis for proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  J Harding; T J S Chesser; M Bradley
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-01-08

10.  A computer-assisted systematic quality monitoring method for cervical hip fracture radiography.

Authors:  Mats Geijer; Olof Laurin; Ragnar Johnsson; Sven Laurin
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2016-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.