Literature DB >> 9281906

Dynamics of human milk extraction: a comparative study of breast feeding and breast pumping.

C Zoppou1, S I Barry, G N Mercer.   

Abstract

We describe a mathematical model of the flow and deformation in a human teat. Our aim is to compare the theoretical milk yield during infant breast feeding with that obtained through the use of a breast pump. Infants use a peristaltic motion of the tongue, along with some suction, to extract milk, whereas breast pumps use a cyclic pattern of suction only. Our model is based on quasi-linear poroelasticity whereby the teat is modelled as a cylindrical porous elastic material saturated with fluid. We impose a cyclic axial suction pressure difference across the teat and impose a radial compressive force moving along the teat which mimics infant suckling. This is compared to the case of cyclic and steady pumping only which models the action of breast pumps. The results illustrate that there is an optimal time to apply the compressive force during the suction cycle that will increase the flow rate in our theoretical teat. The model and results may be of use in the future design of effective breast pumps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9281906     DOI: 10.1007/bf02460001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  3 in total

1.  Changes in R0/R∞ ratio and membrane capacitance are associated with milk removal from the breast.

Authors:  Hazel Gardner; Ching Tat Lai; Leigh Ward; Donna Geddes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Mimicking the Impact of Infant Tongue Peristalsis on Behavior of Solid Oral Dosage Forms Administered During Breastfeeding.

Authors:  Rebekah L Scheuerle; Richard A Kendall; Catherine Tuleu; Nigel K H Slater; Stephen E Gerrard
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  Characterisation of zinc delivery from a nipple shield delivery system using a breastfeeding simulation apparatus.

Authors:  Rebekah L Scheuerle; Sylvaine F A Bruggraber; Stephen E Gerrard; Richard A Kendall; Catherine Tuleu; Nigel K H Slater
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.