PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intraarterial urokinase in the treatment of superior mesenteric arterial (SMA) embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within 3 years, 10 patients (six men, four women; aged 62-82 years) with angiographically proved SMA emboli were selected on the basis of absence of peritoneal signs of intestinal necrosis at physical examination and normal abdominal plain radiographs to undergo local lysis with urokinase. RESULTS: The procedure was performed without complications in all 10 patients. The embolus was successfully lysed in nine patients (90%). Clinical success was achieved in seven patients (70%); however, in one patient laparotomy was required to confirm the clinical finding. None of these patients had recurrent embolism or postischemic intestinal stenosis during follow-up (mean, 11.2 months). The three remaining patients (30%) underwent laparotomy subsequent to failure of intraarterial treatment with urokinase. CONCLUSION: Fibrinolytic treatment with urokinase may be an effective alternative to surgical embolectomy in patients with SMA embolism without clinical or radiologic signs of intestinal infarction. In this small series, abatement of abdominal pain in the 1st hour of fibrinolytic treatment was the best indicator of clinical success. Pain persisted in patients with intestinal infarction.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intraarterial urokinase in the treatment of superior mesenteric arterial (SMA) embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within 3 years, 10 patients (six men, four women; aged 62-82 years) with angiographically proved SMA emboli were selected on the basis of absence of peritoneal signs of intestinal necrosis at physical examination and normal abdominal plain radiographs to undergo local lysis with urokinase. RESULTS: The procedure was performed without complications in all 10 patients. The embolus was successfully lysed in nine patients (90%). Clinical success was achieved in seven patients (70%); however, in one patient laparotomy was required to confirm the clinical finding. None of these patients had recurrent embolism or postischemic intestinal stenosis during follow-up (mean, 11.2 months). The three remaining patients (30%) underwent laparotomy subsequent to failure of intraarterial treatment with urokinase. CONCLUSION: Fibrinolytic treatment with urokinase may be an effective alternative to surgical embolectomy in patients with SMAembolism without clinical or radiologic signs of intestinal infarction. In this small series, abatement of abdominal pain in the 1st hour of fibrinolytic treatment was the best indicator of clinical success. Pain persisted in patients with intestinal infarction.
Authors: D Heidinger; E Trommer; A Weichselberger; S Weiss; S Sokolowski; P Owczarek; F Gniffke Journal: Internist (Berl) Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 0.743
Authors: Miklosh Bala; Jeffry Kashuk; Ernest E Moore; Yoram Kluger; Walter Biffl; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Offir Ben-Ishay; Chen Rubinstein; Zsolt J Balogh; Ian Civil; Federico Coccolini; Ari Leppaniemi; Andrew Peitzman; Luca Ansaloni; Michael Sugrue; Massimo Sartelli; Salomone Di Saverio; Gustavo P Fraga; Fausto Catena Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: J V T Tilsed; A Casamassima; H Kurihara; D Mariani; I Martinez; J Pereira; L Ponchietti; A Shamiyeh; F Al-Ayoubi; L A B Barco; M Ceolin; A J G D'Almeida; S Hilario; A L Olavarria; M M Ozmen; L F Pinheiro; M Poeze; G Triantos; F T Fuentes; S U Sierra; K Soreide; H Yanar Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 3.693